Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39030270›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Cardiology2024

Computational modelling of cardiovascular pathophysiology to risk stratify commercial spaceflight.

Paul D Morris, Ryan A Anderton, Karina Marshall-Goebel, Joseph K Britton, Stuart M C Lee, Nicolas P Smith, Frans N van de Vosse, Karen M Ong, Tom A Newman, Daniel J Taylor and 5 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Cardiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Paul D MorrisDivision of Clinical Medicine, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK. paul.morris@sheffield.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-3965-121X
Ryan A AndertonMedical Department, Spaceflight, UK Civil Aviation Authority, Gatwick, UK.
Karina Marshall-GoebelThe National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5240-7625
Joseph K BrittonAerospace Medicine Specialist Wing, Royal Air Force (RAF) Centre of Aerospace Medicine, Henlow, UK.
Stuart M C LeeKBR, Human Health Countermeasures Element, NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7065-5182
Nicolas P SmithVictoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.
Frans N van de VosseDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands.
Karen M OngVirgin Galactic Medical, Truth or Consequences, NM, USA.
Tom A NewmanDivision of Clinical Medicine, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7987-9948
Daniel J TaylorDivision of Clinical Medicine, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Tim ChicoDivision of Clinical Medicine, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Julian P GunnDivision of Clinical Medicine, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Andrew J NarracottDivision of Clinical Medicine, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3068-6192
D Rod HoseDivision of Clinical Medicine, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Ian HallidayDivision of Clinical Medicine, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For more than 60 years, humans have travelled into space. Until now, the majority of astronauts have been professional, government agency astronauts selected, in part, for their superlative physical fitness and the absence of disease. Commercial spaceflight is now becoming accessible to members of the public, many of whom would previously have been excluded owing to unsatisfactory fitness or the presence of cardiorespiratory diseases. While data exist on the effects of gravitational and acceleration (G) forces on human physiology, data on the effects of the aerospace environment in unselected members of the public, and particularly in those with clinically significant pathology, are limited. Although short in duration, these high acceleration forces can potentially either impair the experience or, more seriously, pose a risk to health in some individuals. Rather than expose individuals with existing pathology to G forces to collect data, computational modelling might be useful to predict the nature and severity of cardiovascular diseases that are of sufficient risk to restrict access, require modification, or suggest further investigation or training before flight. In this Review, we explore state-of-the-art, zero-dimensional, compartmentalized models of human cardiovascular pathophysiology that can be used to simulate the effects of acceleration forces, homeostatic regulation and ventilation-perfusion matching, using data generated by long-arm centrifuge facilities of the US National Aeronautics and Space Administration and the European Space Agency to risk stratify individuals and help to improve safety in commercial suborbital spaceflight.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesSpace FlightAstronautsComputer SimulationHumansModels, CardiovascularRisk AssessmentWeightlessness

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.