Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39030276›Full record

ArticleNature ecology & evolution2024

The brittle star genome illuminates the genetic basis of animal appendage regeneration.

Elise Parey, Olga Ortega-Martinez, Jérôme Delroisse, Laura Piovani, Anna Czarkwiani, David Dylus, Srishti Arya, Samuel Dupont, Michael Thorndyke, Tomas Larsson and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature ecology & evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The tuxedo sea urchinbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Looking back on 2024.Nature ecology & evolution · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Elise PareyCentre for Life's Origins and Evolution, Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, UK. e.parey@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3394-2697
Olga Ortega-MartinezTjärnö Marine Laboratory, Department of Marine Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Strömstad, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2734-6434
Jérôme DelroisseBiology of Marine Organisms and Biomimetics Unit, Research Institute for Biosciences, University of Mons, Mons, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9233-6470
Laura PiovaniCentre for Life's Origins and Evolution, Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3491-5068
Anna CzarkwianiCentre for Life's Origins and Evolution, Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8845-3113
David DylusCentre for Life's Origins and Evolution, Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0327-0781
Srishti AryaCentre for Life's Origins and Evolution, Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-9258-9787
Samuel DupontDepartment of Biology and Environmental Science, University of Gothenburg, Kristineberg Marine Research Station, Fiskebäckskil, Sweden.
Michael ThorndykeDepartment of Biology and Environmental Science, University of Gothenburg, Kristineberg Marine Research Station, Fiskebäckskil, Sweden.
Tomas LarssonDepartment of Cell and Molecular Biology, National Bioinformatics Infrastructure Sweden, Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Kerstin JohannessonTjärnö Marine Laboratory, Department of Marine Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Strömstad, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0176-7986
Katherine M BuckleyDepartment of Biological Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6585-8943
Pedro MartinezDepartament de Genètica, Microbiologia, i Estadística, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3956-7541
Paola OliveriCentre for Life's Origins and Evolution, Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, UK. p.oliveri@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3477-8529
Ferdinand MarlétazCentre for Life's Origins and Evolution, Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, UK. f.marletaz@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8124-4266

Funding

EC | EC Seventh Framework Programm | FP7 Research infrastructures (FP7-INFRASTRUCTURES - Specific Programme "Capacities": Research Infrastructures) ASSEMBLE (227799)EC | Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020) MARISTEMFonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS (Belgian National Fund for Scientific Research) 40013965Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS (Belgian National Fund for Scientific Research) T.0169.20Japan Society for the Promotion of Science London (JSPS London) JP 19K06620Leverhulme Trust RPG-2021-436National Science Foundation (NSF) 2131297RCUK | Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) BB/V01109X/1RCUK | Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) BB/W017865/1Royal Society NIF\R1\222125Royal Society URF\R1\191161Vetenskapsrådet (Swedish Research Council) 253016979
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Species within nearly all extant animal lineages are capable of regenerating body parts. However, it remains unclear whether the gene expression programme controlling regeneration is evolutionarily conserved. Brittle stars are a species-rich class of echinoderms with outstanding regenerative abilities, but investigations into the genetic bases of regeneration in this group have been hindered by the limited genomic resources. Here we report a chromosome-scale genome assembly for the brittle star Amphiura filiformis. We show that the brittle star genome is the most rearranged among echinoderms sequenced so far, featuring a reorganized Hox cluster reminiscent of the rearrangements observed in sea urchins. In addition, we performed an extensive profiling of gene expression during brittle star adult arm regeneration and identified sequential waves of gene expression governing wound healing, proliferation and differentiation. We conducted comparative transcriptomic analyses with other invertebrate and vertebrate models for appendage regeneration and uncovered hundreds of genes with conserved expression dynamics, particularly during the proliferative phase of regeneration. Our findings emphasize the crucial importance of echinoderms to detect long-range expression conservation between vertebrates and classical invertebrate regeneration model systems.

Indexed as

EchinodermataGenomeRegenerationAnimalsExtremitiesTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID39030276
PMCPMC11310086

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.