ArticleWorld neurosurgery2024
Patients at Greatest Risk of Missing Initial 1-Year Follow-Up After Pituitary Adenoma Resection.
Article in World neurosurgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Factors Affecting Long-Term Outcomes and Quality of Life of Patients with Pituitary Adenoma After Endoscopic Endonasal Transsphenoidal Surgery (EETS) Using the SF-36 Questionnaire (Indonesian Version).Journal of the ASEAN Federation of Endocrine Societies · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveRoutine evaluation and surveillance imaging after pituitary adenoma (PA) endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal resection (EETS) is a neurosurgical practice to identify tumor recurrence. This study aims to identify social and clinical factors that may contribute to patients missing their initial 1-year follow-up appointment and provide guidance for targeted education to improve patient adherence with postoperative treatment plans, ultimately reducing unknown adenoma recurrence.
methodsThe authors performed a single-center retrospective review of patients who underwent EETS for PAs from 2007 to 2023. Patients were analyzed for sociodemographic factors, presenting symptoms, time to surgery, surgical outcomes, and adherence to postoperative follow-up visits at 1 year after surgery.
resultsA total of 256 patients with PAs treated by EETS met inclusion criteria; 218 (85%) of these patients attended 1-year follow-up, and 38 (15%) missed this visit. Twenty-nine (76%) individuals who missed their 1-year follow up were men (P = 0.006). Divorced/widowed/separated patients were 2 times more likely to miss their follow-up compared with their married counterparts (P = 0.008). Additional significant risk factors included older age, as the mean age for patients who missed their 1-year appointment was 60.1 years compared with 54.7 years (P = 0.028). Patients with visual field deficits at initial presentation were also less likely to follow-up at 1 year (P = 0.03).
conclusionsRisk factors of missed 1-year follow-up appointments after PA resection include male sex, divorced/widowed/separated marital status, older age, and the presence of visual deficits at initial presentation. Increased education efforts can be selectively aimed at these at-risk patient cohorts to improve patient compliance and reduce consequences of undetected tumor recurrence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.