Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39033422›Full record

ArticleRisk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis2025

Enhancing maritime transportation security: A data-driven Bayesian network analysis of terrorist attack risks.

Massoud Mohsendokht, Huanhuan Li, Christos Kontovas, Chia-Hsun Chang, Zhuohua Qu, Zaili Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Enhancing maritime transportation security: A data-driven Bayesian network analysis of terrorist attack risks.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Massoud MohsendokhtFaculty of Engineering and Technology, Liverpool Logistics, Offshore and Marine (LOOM) Research Institute, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, Merseyside, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2271-6838
Huanhuan LiFaculty of Engineering and Technology, Liverpool Logistics, Offshore and Marine (LOOM) Research Institute, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, Merseyside, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4293-4763
Christos KontovasFaculty of Engineering and Technology, Liverpool Logistics, Offshore and Marine (LOOM) Research Institute, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, Merseyside, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9461-6436
Chia-Hsun ChangFaculty of Engineering and Technology, Liverpool Logistics, Offshore and Marine (LOOM) Research Institute, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, Merseyside, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7351-8471
Zhuohua QuLiverpool Business School, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, Merseyside, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9241-9332
Zaili YangFaculty of Engineering and Technology, Liverpool Logistics, Offshore and Marine (LOOM) Research Institute, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, Merseyside, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1385-493X

Funding

European Research Council TRUST CoG 2019 864724
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Maritime terrorist accidents have a significant low-frequency-high-consequence feature and, thus, require new research to address the associated inherent uncertainty and the scarce literature in the field. This article aims to develop a novel method for maritime security risk analysis. It employs real accident data from maritime terrorist attacks over the past two decades to train a data-driven Bayesian network (DDBN) model. The findings help pinpoint key contributing factors, scrutinize their interdependencies, ascertain the probability of different terrorist scenarios, and describe their impact on different manifestations of maritime terrorism. The established DDBN model undergoes a thorough verification and validation process employing various techniques, such as sensitivity, metrics, and comparative analyses. Additionally, it is tested against recent real-world cases to demonstrate its effectiveness in both retrospective and prospective risk propagation, encompassing both diagnostic and predictive capabilities. These findings provide valuable insights for the various stakeholders, including companies and government bodies, fostering comprehension of maritime terrorism and potentially fortifying preventive measures and emergency management.

Indexed as

Bayesian networkGlobal Terrorism Databasemaritime terrorismsecurity risk assessment

Identifiers

PMID39033422
PMCPMC11787954

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.