Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39035211›Full record

ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Center2022

New substituted molecular classifications of advanced gastric adenocarcinoma: characteristics and probable treatment strategies.

Bingzhi Wang, Chunxia Du, Lin Li, Yibin Xie, Chunfang Hu, Zhuo Li, Yongjian Zhu, Yanling Yuan, Xiuyun Liu, Ning Lu and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the National Cancer Center, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Bingzhi WangDepartment of Pathology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.
Chunxia DuDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.
Lin LiDepartment of Pathology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.
Yibin XieDepartment of Abdominal Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.
Chunfang HuDepartment of Pathology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.
Zhuo LiDepartment of Pathology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.
Yongjian ZhuDepartment of Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.
Yanling YuanDepartment of Pathology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.
Xiuyun LiuDepartment of Pathology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.
Ning LuDepartment of Pathology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.
Liyan XueDepartment of Pathology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Gastric adenocarcinoma (GA) is a heterogeneous tumor, and the accurate classification of GA is important. Previous classifications are based on molecular analysis and have not focused on GA with the primitive enterocyte phenotype (GAPEP), a unique subtype with a poor prognosis and frequent liver metastases. New substituted molecular (SM) classifications based on immunohistochemistry (IHC) are needed. Methods: According to the IHC staining results, we divided 582 cases into six types: mismatch repair deficient (dMMR), Epstein-Barr virus associated (EBVa), the primitive enterocyte phenotype (PEP), the epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT) phenotype, not otherwise specified/P53 mutated (NOS/P53m) and not otherwise specified/P53 wild-type (NOS/P53w). We analyzed the clinicopathological features, the immune microenvironment (PD-L1, CD8) and expression of HER2 and VEGFR2 of those types. Results: There were 31 (5.3%) cases of the dMMR type, 13 (2.2%) cases of the EBVa type, 44 (7.6%) cases of the PEP type, 122 (21.0%) cases of the EMT type, 127 (21.8%) cases of the NOS/P53m type and 245 (42.1%) cases of the NOS/P53w type. Patients with the dMMR type had the best survival ( Conclusion: Different SM classifications have different clinicopathological features and expression patterns, which indicate the probable clinical treatment strategies for these subtypes.

Indexed as

Advanced gastric adenocarcinomaExpression patternSubstituted molecular classification

Identifiers

PMID39035211
PMCPMC11256717

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.