ReviewComputational and structural biotechnology journal2024
Heterogeneous network approaches to protein pathway prediction.
Review in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- GATSBI: improving context-aware protein embeddings through biologically motivated data splits.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- GATSBI: Improving context-aware protein embeddings through biologically motivated data splits.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Graph-Based Gene Embedding.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
- The Constrained Disorder Principle: A Paradigm Shift for Accurate Interactome Mapping and Information Analysis in Complex Biological Systems.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Computational Approaches for Pathway-Centric Analysis of Protein Post-Translational Modifications.Proteomics · 2025Review
- A Multi-Modal Graph Neural Network Framework for Parkinson's Disease Therapeutic Discovery.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding protein-protein interactions (PPIs) and the pathways they comprise is essential for comprehending cellular functions and their links to specific phenotypes. Despite the prevalence of molecular data generated by high-throughput sequencing technologies, a significant gap remains in translating this data into functional information regarding the series of interactions that underlie phenotypic differences. In this review, we present an in-depth analysis of heterogeneous network methodologies for modeling protein pathways, highlighting the critical role of integrating multifaceted biological data. It outlines the process of constructing these networks, from data representation to machine learning-driven predictions and evaluations. The work underscores the potential of heterogeneous networks in capturing the complexity of proteomic interactions, thereby offering enhanced accuracy in pathway prediction. This approach not only deepens our understanding of cellular processes but also opens up new possibilities in disease treatment and drug discovery by leveraging the predictive power of comprehensive proteomic data analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.