ArticleBioengineering & translational medicine2024
Highly efficient CRISPR/Cas9-mediated exon skipping for recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa.
Article in Bioengineering & translational medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- A PepFect14 analog improves non-viral CRISPR delivery in primary human cells to facilitate genome editing and repair.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2026Article
- Developing CRISPR-Based Therapies for Epidermolysis Bullosa: A Comprehensive Review of Current Strategies.Drugs · 2026Review
- Gene therapy for genodermatoses at the crossroads of innovation and clinical translation.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Efficient Dual Cas9 Nickase Correction of a Prevalent PathogenicJID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health · 2025Article
- Enhanced HDR-mediated correction of heterozygousMolecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2025Article
- Engineering structural variants to interrogate genome function.Nature genetics · 2024Review
- Highly efficient CRISPR/Cas9-mediated exon skipping for recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gene therapy based on the CRISPR/Cas9 system has emerged as a promising strategy for treating the monogenic fragile skin disorder recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (RDEB). With this approach problematic wounds could be grafted with gene edited, patient-specific skin equivalents. Precise gene editing using homology-directed repair (HDR) is the ultimate goal, however low efficiencies have hindered progress. Reframing strategies based on highly efficient non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) repair aimed at excising dispensable, mutation-harboring exons offer a promising alternative approach for restoring the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.