Evidence mapPaperPMID 39036710Full record

SynthesisWellcome open research2024

Trace amine-associated receptor 1 (TAAR1) agonism for psychosis: a living systematic review and meta-analysis of human and non-human data.

Spyridon Siafis, Virginia Chiocchia, Malcolm R Macleod, Charlotte Austin, Ava Homiar, Francesca Tinsdeall, Claire Friedrich, Fiona J Ramage, Jaycee Kennett, Nobuyuki Nomura and 29 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Wellcome open research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Emerging non-DFrontiers in psychiatry · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. GALENOS approach to triangulating evidence (GATE): transforming the landscape of psychiatric research.The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

39 authors.

Spyridon SiafisDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8264-2039
Virginia ChiocchiaInstitute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6196-3308
Malcolm R MacleodCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9187-9839
Charlotte AustinDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, UK.
Ava HomiarDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5772-2475
Francesca TinsdeallCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-9248-2954
Claire FriedrichDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5841-4324
Fiona J RamageCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4855-7911
Jaycee KennettDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7312-8676
Nobuyuki NomuraDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Olena MaksymCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.
Grazia RutiglianoDepartment of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, England, UK.
Luke J VanoDepartment of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, England, UK.
Robert A McCutcheonDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, UK.
David GilbertGALENOS Global Experiential Advisory Board, InHealth Associates, London, UK.
Edoardo G OstinelliDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8717-0832
Claire StansfieldEPPI Centre, Social Research Institute, University College London, London, England, UK.
Hossein DehdariradEPPI Centre, Social Research Institute, University College London, London, England, UK.
Damian Omari JumaMy Mind Our Humanity, Young Leaders for Global Mental Health, Mombasa, Kenya.
Simonne WrightStellenbosch University/South African Medical Research Council Genomics of Brain Disorders Extramural Research Unit, Department of Psychiatry, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, Western Cape, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3295-256X
Ouma SimpleStellenbosch University/South African Medical Research Council Genomics of Brain Disorders Extramural Research Unit, Department of Psychiatry, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, Western Cape, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4510-6736
Olufisayo ElugbadeboDepartment of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Oyo, Nigeria.
Thomy ToniaInstitute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Ioannis MantasDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Oliver D HowesDepartment of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, England, UK.
Toshi A FurukawaDepartment of Health Promotion and Human Behavior, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine/School of Public Health, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2159-3776
Lea MilliganMQ Mental Health Research, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7865-5533
Carmen MorenoDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, IiSGM, CIBERSAM, ISCIII, School of Medicine, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Community of Madrid, Spain.
Julian H ElliottCochrane Australia, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Janna HastingsInstitute for Implementation Science in Health Care, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3469-4923
James ThomasEPPI Centre, Social Research Institute, University College London, London, England, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4805-4190
Susan MichieCentre for Behaviour Change, University College London, London, England, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0063-6378
Emily S SenaCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3282-8502
Soraya SeedatStellenbosch University/South African Medical Research Council Genomics of Brain Disorders Extramural Research Unit, Department of Psychiatry, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, Western Cape, South Africa.
Matthias EggerInstitute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Jennifer PottsDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, UK.
Andrea Cipriani *Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, UK.
Georgia Salanti *Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Stefan Leucht *Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Trace amine-associated receptor 1 (TAAR1) agonism shows promise for treating psychosis, prompting us to synthesise data from human and non-human studies. Methods: We co-produced a living systematic review of controlled studies examining TAAR1 agonists in individuals (with or without psychosis/schizophrenia) and relevant animal models. Two independent reviewers identified studies in multiple electronic databases (until 17.11.2023), extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. Primary outcomes were standardised mean differences (SMD) for overall symptoms in human studies and hyperlocomotion in animal models. We also examined adverse events and neurotransmitter signalling. We synthesised data with random-effects meta-analyses. Results: Nine randomised trials provided data for two TAAR1 agonists (ulotaront and ralmitaront), and 15 animal studies for 10 TAAR1 agonists. Ulotaront and ralmitaront demonstrated few differences compared to placebo in improving overall symptoms in adults with acute schizophrenia (N=4 studies, n=1291 participants; SMD=0.15, 95%CI: -0.05, 0.34), and ralmitaront was less efficacious than risperidone (N=1, n=156, SMD=-0.53, 95%CI: -0.86, -0.20). Large placebo response was observed in ulotaront phase-III trials. Limited evidence suggested a relatively benign side-effect profile for TAAR1 agonists, although nausea and sedation were common after a single dose of ulotaront. In animal studies, TAAR1 agonists improved hyperlocomotion compared to control (N=13 studies, k=41 experiments, SMD=1.01, 95%CI: 0.74, 1.27), but seemed less efficacious compared to dopamine D Conclusions: TAAR1 agonists may be less efficacious than dopamine D Registration: PROSPERO-ID: CRD42023451628.

Indexed as

Antipsychoticsclinical trialsliving evidencemeta-analysispreclinical studiesschizophreniasystematic reviewTAAR1

Identifiers

PMID39036710
PMCPMC11258611

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.