ArticleMolecular biology reports2024
Investigating the impact of SMAD2 and SMAD4 downregulation in colorectal cancer and their correlation with immune markers, prognosis, and drug resistance and sensitivity.
Article in Molecular biology reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Post-Transcriptional Modification Integration for Ligand-Receptor Cellular Network Inference.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2026Article
- Phytochemical profiling and anticancer potential of pistachio wastes against MCF-7 breast cancer cells: a metabolic and apoptotic pathway analysis.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhile many genes linked to colorectal cancer (CRC) contribute to cancer development, a thorough investigation is needed to explore crucial hub genes yet to be fully studied. A pivotal pathway in CRC is transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β). This study aimed to assess SMAD2 and SMAD4 gene expression from this pathway. METHODS AND
resultsCounted data from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were examined, comparing 483 tumor and 41 normal samples. Using clinical data, genes impacting overall survival (OS) were evaluated. GSE39582 was employed to confirmed the levels of genes in CRC compared to the normal samples. Additionally, employing unhealthy samples and the RT-qPCR means our outcomes was validated. Finally, PharmacoGx information were utilized to connect the levels of potential genes to drug tolerance and susceptibility. Our findings showed SMAD2 and SMAD4 levels in TGF-β signaling were more significant than other pathway genes. Our findings indicated that the protein levels of these genes were lower in malignant tissues than in healthy tissues. Results revealed a significant correlation between low levels of SMAD2 and unfavorable OS in CRC individuals. RT-qPCR results demonstrated decreased expressions of both SMAD2 and SMAD4 in cancer tissues compared to elevated levels in adjacent normal samples. Our results showed significant association between selected genes and immune cell infiltration markers such as CD8+, and B-cells. Our results indicated a potential association among the levels of SMAD2 and SMAD4 genes and tolerance and susceptibility to Nilotinib and Panobinostat drugs.
conclusionReduced expression of SMAD2 and SMAD4 may be pivotal in CRC progression, impacting downstream genes unrelated to patient OS. These findings suggest a potential role for SMAD2 and SMAD4 as predictive markers for drug response in CRC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39037563What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.