Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39039992›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2024

Time Series AI Model for Acute Kidney Injury Detection Based on a Multicenter Distributed Research Network: Development and Verification Study.

Suncheol Heo, Eun-Ae Kang, Jae Yong Yu, Hae Reong Kim, Suehyun Lee, Kwangsoo Kim, Yul Hwangbo, Rae Woong Park, Hyunah Shin, Kyeongmin Ryu and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Temporal Recurrent Neural Networks for Predicting Acute Kidney Injury Recovery by Time of Discharge.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Suncheol Heo *Department of Biomedical System Informatics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-9087-2093
Eun-Ae Kang *Medical Informatics Collaborative Unit, Department of Research Affairs, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1322-7725
Jae Yong Yu *Department of Biomedical System Informatics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-6922-8538
Hae Reong KimDepartment of Biomedical System Informatics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-2079-0498
Suehyun LeeDepartment of Computer Engineering, Gachon University, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-0651-6481
Kwangsoo KimTransdisciplinary Department of Medicine & Advanced Technology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4586-5062
Yul HwangboHealthcare AI Team, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-7129-2133
Rae Woong ParkDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-4989-3287
Hyunah ShinHealthcare Data Science Center, Konyang University Hospital, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-1537-0608
Kyeongmin RyuHealthcare Data Science Center, Konyang University Hospital, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0009-0008-7148-7297
Chungsoo KimDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Ajou University Graduate School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1802-1777
Hyojung JungHealthcare AI Team, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8366-9054
Yebin ChegalDepartment of Statistics, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0009-0007-5708-3424
Jae-Hyun LeeDivision of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-0760-0071
Yu Rang ParkDepartment of Biomedical System Informatics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4210-2094

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a marker of clinical deterioration and renal toxicity. While there are many studies offering prediction models for the early detection of AKI, those predicting AKI occurrence using distributed research network (DRN)-based time series data are rare. Objective: In this study, we aimed to detect the early occurrence of AKI by applying an interpretable long short-term memory (LSTM)-based model to hospital electronic health record (EHR)-based time series data in patients who took nephrotoxic drugs using a DRN. Methods: We conducted a multi-institutional retrospective cohort study of data from 6 hospitals using a DRN. For each institution, a patient-based data set was constructed using 5 drugs for AKI, and an interpretable multivariable LSTM (IMV-LSTM) model was used for training. This study used propensity score matching to mitigate differences in demographics and clinical characteristics. Additionally, the temporal attention values of the AKI prediction model's contribution variables were demonstrated for each institution and drug, with differences in highly important feature distributions between the case and control data confirmed using 1-way ANOVA. Results: This study analyzed 8643 and 31,012 patients with and without AKI, respectively, across 6 hospitals. When analyzing the distribution of AKI onset, vancomycin showed an earlier onset (median 12, IQR 5-25 days), and acyclovir was the slowest compared to the other drugs (median 23, IQR 10-41 days). Our temporal deep learning model for AKI prediction performed well for most drugs. Acyclovir had the highest average area under the receiver operating characteristic curve score per drug (0.94), followed by acetaminophen (0.93), vancomycin (0.92), naproxen (0.90), and celecoxib (0.89). Based on the temporal attention values of the variables in the AKI prediction model, verified lymphocytes and calcvancomycin ium had the highest attention, whereas lymphocytes, albumin, and hemoglobin tended to decrease over time, and urine pH and prothrombin time tended to increase. Conclusions: Early surveillance of AKI outbreaks can be achieved by applying an IMV-LSTM based on time series data through an EHR-based DRN. This approach can help identify risk factors and enable early detection of adverse drug reactions when prescribing drugs that cause renal toxicity before AKI occurs.

Indexed as

adverse drug reactionadverse reactionadverse reactionsartificial intelligencecommon data modeldetectdetectiondistributed research networkkidneymachine learningmulticenter studynephrologypharmaceuticalpharmaceuticspharmacologypharmacyreal world datarenaltime seriestime series AItoxictoxicity

Identifiers

PMID39039992
PMCPMC11263760

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.