Evidence mapPaperPMID 39040189Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2024

Acceptability of a community health worker- led health literacy intervention on lifestyle modification among hypertensive and diabetes patients in the City of Harare, Zimbabwe.

Nyaradzai Arster Katena, Shepherd Shamu, Golden Tafadzwa Fana, Evans Dewa, Admire Dombojena, Simbarashe Rusakaniko

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nyaradzai Arster KatenaGlobal Public Health and Family Medicine Department, University of Zimbabwe, Faculty of Medicine &Health Sciences.ORCID 0000-0002-3025-7187
Shepherd ShamuGlobal Public Health and Family Medicine Department, University of Zimbabwe, Faculty of Medicine &Health Sciences.
Golden Tafadzwa FanaDepartment of Medicine, University of Zimbabwe, Faculty of Medicine& Health Sciences.ORCID 0009-0009-2896-4462
Evans DewaCity of Harare, City Health Department.
Admire DombojenaCity of Harare, City Health Department.
Simbarashe RusakanikoGlobal Public Health and Family Medicine Department, University of Zimbabwe, Faculty of Medicine &Health Sciences.ORCID 0000-0002-3159-0205

Funding

Enhancing Non-communicable diseases Research and Innovation Capacity in Harare, Zimbabwe (ENRICH)D43TW011968 · COLLEGE OF HEALTH SCIS UNIV OF ZIMBABWE · 2025 to 2025
$250k
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW011968
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deploying community health workers (CHWs) is a vital strategy to improve health at a community level in low- and middle-income countries. Whilst there is substantial evidence on the effectiveness of CHWs interventions, there is a need for more research on the mechanisms through which these interventions work. Understanding the acceptability of these interventions is one way of assessing the mechanisms through which they work. This article examines the acceptability of a community health worker- led health literacy intervention on lifestyle modification among hypertensive and diabetes patients based on the perspectives of the CHWs, community nurses and diabetes and hypertensive patients. A qualitative study was imbedded within a cluster randomized trial to assess the effectiveness community health worker- led health literacy intervention on lifestyle modification among hypertensive and diabetes patients in the City of Harare, Zimbabwe. Data were gathered through semi-structured interviews with 3 community health nurses and 15 diabetes and hypertension patients as well as 2 focus group discussions with CHWs. Data were analyzed manually using the thematic analysis method. There was consensus that the intervention had many benefits amongst CHWs and community nurses. However, among patients, there were mixed perceptions regarding the benefits of the intervention. The main challenges that were mentioned by CHWs include resistance to advice by patients, insufficient resources, and lack of acceptance at some of the patient's homes. All participants believed the intervention was acceptable. Our study provides vital information that should be considered in upscaling CHW led interventions.

Indexed as

AcceptabilityCommunity Health WorkerDiabetesHypertensionLifestyle modificationQualitativeZimbabwe

Identifiers

PMID39040189
PMCPMC11261947

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.