ArticleJAMA network open2024
Pediatric Lipid Screening Prevalence Using Nationwide Electronic Medical Records.
Article in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dyslipidemia in Lebanese children and adolescents: parents' knowledge and practices.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Test the Child, Uncover the High-Risk Parent: A Call to Expand Universal Pediatric Lipid Screening.American journal of lifestyle medicine · 2026Article
- Assessment of BMI percentages of obesity thresholds and cardiometabolic risk factors in children and adolescents: a retrospective cross-sectional study in Beijing.Lipids in health and disease · 2026Article
- Changes in Youth Cholesterol Screening Rates in an Academic Center During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Pediatric cardiology · 2026Article
- Examining Biomarkers for Dyslipidemia, Diabetes, and NAFLD by CDC's 2022 Extended BMI Percentiles in US Youth Aged 6-17 Years.Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.) · 2026Article
- Effects of different exercise modalities on lipid profiles in overweight and obese children and adolescents: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Article
- Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of Lebanese physicians on the screening of pediatric dyslipidemias: a KAP cross-sectional study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Pediatric Hypertriglyceridemia: Lipoprotein Metabolism, Etiology, and Management.Current pediatrics reports · 2025Article
- Pro‑inflammatory insulin‑resistant lipid phenotype in down syndrome identified byScientific reports · 2025Article
- Assessment of Guideline-Recommended Laboratory Screening for Obesity-Related Chronic Conditions in US Youth 10-18 Years.Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.) · 2025Article
- Impact of exercise on cardiovascular disease risk in overweight or obese children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Cholesterol screening by nativity status in pediatric patients receiving care in United States community-based clinics.Preventive medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Universal screening to identify unfavorable lipid levels is recommended for US children aged 9 to 11 years and adolescents aged 17 to 21 years (hereafter, young adults); however, screening benefits in these individuals have been questioned. Current use of lipid screening and prevalence of elevated lipid measurements among US youths is not well understood. Objective: To investigate the prevalence of ambulatory pediatric lipid screening and elevated or abnormal lipid measurements among US screened youths by patient characteristic and test type. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used data from the IQVIA Ambulatory Electronic Medical Record database and included youths aged 9 to 21 years with 1 or more valid measurement of height and weight during the observation period (2018-2021). Body mass index (BMI) was calculated and categorized using standard pediatric BMI percentiles (9-19 years) and adult BMI categories (≥20 years). The data were analyzed from October 6, 2022, to January 18, 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures: Lipid measurements were defined as abnormal if 1 or more of the following test results was identified: total cholesterol (≥200 mg/dL), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (≥130 mg/dL), very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (≥31 mg/dL), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (≥145 mg/dL), and triglycerides (≥100 mg/dL for children aged 9 years or ≥130 mg/dL for patients aged 10-21 years). After adjustment for age group, sex, race and ethnicity, and BMI category, adjusted prevalence ratios (aPRs) and 95% CIs were calculated. Results: Among 3 226 002 youths (23.9% aged 9-11 years, 34.8% aged 12-16 years, and 41.3% aged 17-21 years; 1 723 292 females [53.4%]; 60.0% White patients, 9.5% Black patients, and 2.4% Asian patients), 11.3% had 1 or more documented lipid screening tests. The frequency of lipid screening increased by age group (9-11 years, 9.0%; 12-16 years, 11.1%; 17-21 years, 12.9%) and BMI category (range, 9.2% [healthy weight] to 21.9% [severe obesity]). Among those screened, 30.2% had abnormal lipid levels. Compared with youths with a healthy weight, prevalence of an abnormal result was higher among those with overweight (aPR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.56-1.61), moderate obesity (aPR, 2.16; 95% CI, 2.14-2.19), and severe obesity (aPR, 2.53; 95% CI, 2.50-2.57). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study of prevalence of lipid screening among US youths aged 9 to 21 years, approximately 1 in 10 were screened. Among them, abnormal lipid levels were identified in 1 in 3 youths overall and 1 in 2 youths with severe obesity. Health care professionals should consider implementing lipid screening among children aged 9 to 11 years, young adults aged 17 to 21 years, and all youths at high cardiovascular risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.