ReviewEpilepsia2024
WONOEP appraisal: Modeling early onset epilepsies.
Review in Epilepsia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Zebrafish models of developmental epileptic encephalopathy accurately reflect clinical electrographic biomarkers.Epilepsia · 2026Article
- Established and emerging new approach methodologies in neuroscience.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Epilepsy has a peak incidence during the neonatal to early childhood period. These early onset epilepsies may be severe conditions frequently associated with comorbidities such as developmental deficits and intellectual disability and, in a significant percentage of patients, may be medication-resistant. The use of adult rodent models in the exploration of mechanisms and treatments for early life epilepsies is challenging, as it ignores significant age-specific developmental differences. More recently, models developed in immature animals, such as rodent pups, or in three-dimensional organoids may more closely model aspects of the immature brain and could result in more translatable findings. Although models are not perfect, they may offer a more controlled screening platform in studies of mechanisms and treatments, which cannot be done in pediatric patient cohorts. On the other hand, more simplified models with higher throughput capacities are required to deal with the large number of epilepsy candidate genes and the need for new treatment options. Therefore, a combination of different modeling approaches will be beneficial in addressing the unmet needs of pediatric epilepsy patients. In this review, we summarize the discussions on this topic that occurred during the XVI Workshop on Neurobiology of Epilepsy, organized in 2022 by the Neurobiology Commission of the International League Against Epilepsy. We provide an overview of selected models of early onset epilepsies, discussing their advantages and disadvantages. Heterologous expression models provide initial functional insights, and zebrafish, rodent models, and brain organoids present increasingly complex platforms for modeling and validating epilepsy-related phenomena. Together, these models offer valuable insights into early onset epilepsies and accelerate hypothesis generation and therapy discovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.