ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2025
Composite dietary antioxidant index is associated with renal anemia: a cross-sectional study.
Article in International urology and nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Association between composite dietary antioxidant indices and anemia: NHANES 2003-2018.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An increasing evidence suggested that chronic kidney disease (CKD) is closely related to oxidative stress, and dietary antioxidant intake can serve as a primary preventive measure for CKD. However, the relationship between composite dietary antioxidant index (CDAI) and renal anemia is not well understood. We postulated that elevated CDAI levels would be inversely related to a higher likelihood of renal anemia. The standardized calculation of CDAI was performed to investigate the relationship between them by a binary regression model. A non-linear relationship was examined through restricted cubic spline curves, and then pinpointed the inflection point. Subgroup analysis was then used to assess the robustness of the model. Finally 5880 participants were included in the study and a notable correlation between CDAI and renal anemia was found (P < 0.0001). In the multivariate linear regression model with adjustment for all confounding variables, the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) was 0.96 (0.94, 0.98; P < 0.0001), A non-linear relationship between CDAI and renal anemia was explored through restricted cubic splines, with a inflection at 6.005. Before the inflection point, for each unit rise in CDAI, the prevalence of renal anemia decreased by 5.7%. Subgroup analysis showed no statistically significant differences in interactions between any subgroups (P > 0.05). Our findings indicated a non-linear negative correlation between CDAI and renal anemia. The causal relationship still needs to be further clarified through large-scale prospective studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39044023What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.