ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2024
Causal relationship between Alzheimer's disease and unstable angina: a bidirectional Mendelian randomization analysis.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Research from observational studies has demonstrated a link between Alzheimer's disease (AD) and a higher risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Uncertainty surrounds the exact genetic cause of AD and coronary heart disease, particularly unstable angina (UA). Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis was used to examine the causal genetic link between AD and UA to evaluate the impact of AD on UA. Methods: The purpose of the bidirectional MR analysis was to investigate the link between exposure and illness causation. Genetic instrumental variables for AD were obtained from European populations using genome-wide association studies (GWAS). The primary causal conclusions were obtained using the inverse variance weighted approach (IVW), and other sensitivity analysis techniques were employed. Sensitivity analyses were carried out to evaluate heterogeneity and horizontal pleiotropy to guarantee accurate MR results. Results: An elevated risk of UA was linked to genetically predicted AD (IVW: OR=3.439, 95% CI: 1.565-7.555, P=0.002). A substantial genetic relationship between UA and the risk of AD was not supported by any evidence in the reverse study (IVW: OR=0.998, 95% CI: 0.995-1.001, P=0.190). Various MR techniques produced consistent results. Sensitivity analysis revealed no discernible heterogeneity or horizontal pleiotropy. Conclusions: One risk factor for UA that we found in our bidirectional Mendelian randomization trial was AD. This highlights the necessity of researching the underlying molecular mechanisms linked to AD and UA as well as the possibility of creating individualized treatment plans based on genetic data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.