Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39046498›Full record

ArticleOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2024

Type 2 diabetes incidence in patients initiating denosumab or alendronate treatment: a primary care cohort study.

Wolfgang Rathmann, Karel Kostev

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Bone as an endocrine regulator of lipid and energy metabolism.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. The role of bone in whole-body energy metabolism.Nature reviews. Endocrinology · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Wolfgang RathmannInstitute for Biometrics and Epidemiology, German Diabetes Center, Leibniz Center for Diabetes Research at Heinrich Heine University, Auf'm Hennekamp 65, Düsseldorf, 40225, Germany. wolfgang.rathmann@ddz.de.
Karel KostevEpidemiology, IQVIA, Frankfurt, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Denosumab initiation is related to a lower risk of type 2 diabetes than alendronate in anti-osteoporotic treatment-naïve users in primary care practices. PURPOSE: Links have been suggested between bone metabolism and glucose tolerance. Downregulation of the receptor activator of nuclear factor κ B ligand (RANKL) signaling improves glucose metabolism. Denosumab, a human monoclonal antibody against RANKL, may be associated with a lower risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D). The aim was to compare incidence rates of T2DM in primary care patients initiating denosumab or alendronate, which is a first-line therapy of osteoporosis. Alendronate as comparator enhances comparability of the two cohorts.

methodThe IQVIA Disease Analyzer comprises a representative panel of general and specialist practices (Germany). A new-user comparative study was conducted among patients with denosumab or alendronate treatment (2010-2021) without history of diabetes and age ≥ 45 years. Incidence rates (per 1,000 person-years) and Cox proportional hazard ratios (HR; 95%CI) for T2DM were estimated.

resultsThe cohorts consisted of 3,354 denosumab (age: 75 years; women: 87%) and 27,068 alendronate (76 years; 86%) users. Overall, 1,038 persons developed T2D during 54,916 person-years. T2DM incidence rates per 1,000 person-years were 11.9 (9.5-14.4) for denosumab and 20.1 (18.8-21.3) for alendronate users, respectively. Denosumab was associated with a reduced risk of T2DM compared to alendronate, adjusting for age, sex, index year, visits, obesity, comorbidities and statins (HR: 0.73; 0.58-0.89).

conclusionIn this comparative study of older patients seen in routine practices, denosumab was associated with a lower risk of developing T2DM than alendronate.

Indexed as

AlendronateBone Density Conservation AgentsDenosumabDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2OsteoporosisAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesFemaleGermanyHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedPrimary Health CareAlendronateBone Density Conservation AgentsDenosumabAlendronatebisphosphonateBoneDenosumabType 2 diabetes

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.