SynthesisPloS one2024
Microbiota composition effect on immunotherapy outcomes in colorectal cancer patients: A systematic review.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Impact of microbiome-modulating strategies in cancer patients receiving immunotherapy (MSIT): A systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2026Pooled it
- Gut microbial signatures and immunotherapy outcomes in NSCLC and melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC cancer · 2026Pooled it
- Microbiome and Response to Therapy in Triple Negative Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review.Oncology research · 2026Pooled it
- Review
- Gut Microbiome-Driven Strategies to Overcome Immunotherapy Resistance in Microsatellite-Stable Colorectal Cancer.Cancers · 2026Review
- Phytochemicals remodel antitumor immunity via the "microbiota-metabolite-receptor" axis: focus on colorectal cancer and immunotherapy.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2026Review
- Re-arming checkpoint blockade in MSS colorectal cancer: A precision-microbiome playbook from mechanisms to clinic.Turkish journal of surgery · 2026Article
- Inflammation and Colorectal Cancer Pathogenesis: Molecular, Immunological, and Environmental Features for Therapy Response and Resistances.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Gut Microbiota Biomarkers in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the Era of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Molecular studies on the impact of microbiome on anticancer drug resistance.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- The gut microbiota in colorectal cancer: role in cytokine regulation, intestinal immune barrier dysfunction.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- The circadian-microbiome-immune axis in colorectal cancer: mechanisms of spatiotemporal immunosuppression and chronotherapeutic horizons.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- The Gut Microbiome in Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer: Distinct Signatures, Targeted Prevention and Therapeutic Strategies.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
- Gut microbiota as a new target for anticancer therapy: from mechanism to means of regulation.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2025Review
- Gut microbiota in colorectal cancer: a review of its influence on tumor immune surveillance and therapeutic response.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Nutritional strategies in supporting immune checkpoint inhibitor, PI3K inhibitor, and tyrosine kinase inhibitor cancer therapies.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have emerged as an effective treatment for colorectal cancer (CRC). Studies indicate that the composition of gut microbiota could potentially serve as a biomarker for predicting the clinical effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors.
methodsFollowing PRISMA guidelines, the review was conducted after registering the protocol with PROSPERO. A comprehensive literature search was carried out across five databases: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Assessment tools from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) were used to gauge the quality of the studies.
resultsA total of 5,132 papers were identified, and three studies and one conference abstract published between 2017-2022 met the inclusion criteria and were summarized in a descriptive synthesis table. These four studies were in accord with the following findings, four main phyla, Firmicutes, Bacteroidata, Actinobacteria, and Verrucomicrobiota were associated with CRC patients' clinical response toward ICIs treatment. Ruminococcaceae was predominantly related to CRC patients responding to therapy, while the Micrococcaceae family was more common among the non-responders. Bacterial taxa such as Faecalibacterium and Prevotellaceae were associated with better responses to ICIs and could be predictive biomarkers. The signature of fecal microbiota with Akkermansia muciniphila and Eubacterium rectale enrichment, and Rothia mucilaginosa depletion could independently predict better response to ICIs in patients with CRC.
conclusionThe findings have brought attention to the notable differences in terms of richness and composition of microbiota between patients who responded positively to the treatment and those who did not. Bacterial species and families, such as Faecalibacterium, Bifidobacterium, Lachnospiraceae, Akkermansia sp., Ruminococcaceae, and Prevotellaceae, have consistently surfaced as potential indicators of immunotherapeutic responses. Furthermore, this review also emphasizes the need for additional comprehensive, multi-center studies with larger sample sizes to validate reported microbiota and expand our understanding of the role of gut microbiota in CRC ICIs therapy. PROSPERO ID: CRD42021277691.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.