ArticleCellular signalling2024
Effects of heterologous kinase domains on growth factor receptor specificity.
Article in Cellular signalling, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The kinase domains of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) are highly conserved, yet they are able to discriminate among potential substrates to selectively activate downstream signaling pathways. In this study, we tested the importance of catalytic domain specificity by creating two series of chimeric RTKs. In one set, the kinase domain of insulin-like growth factor I receptor (IGF1R) was replaced by the kinase domains from insulin receptor (IR), macrophage stimulating protein 1 receptor/Ron (Ron) or Src. In the other set of chimeras, the kinase domain of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) was similarly replaced by the kinase domains of IR, Ron, or Src. We expressed the wild-type and chimeric forms of the receptors in mammalian cells. For some signaling events, such as recognition of IRS1, the identity of the tyrosine kinase catalytic domain did not appear to be crucial. In contrast, recognition of some sites, such as the C-terminal autophosphorylation sites on EGFR, did depend on the identity of the kinase domain. Our data also showed that ligand dependence was lost when the native kinase domains were replaced by Src, suggesting that the identity of the kinase domains could be important for proper receptor regulation. Overall, the results are consistent with the idea that the fidelity of RTK signaling depends on co-localization and targeting with substrates, as well as on the intrinsic specificity of the kinase domain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.