Evidence mapPaperPMID 39048521Full record

SynthesisClinical and molecular hepatology2024

Diagnostic accuracy of the Fibrosis-4 index for advanced liver fibrosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ji Won Han, Hee Yeon Kim, Jung Hwan Yu, Mi Na Kim, Young Eun Chon, Ji Hyun An, Young-Joo Jin, Miyoung Choi, Seung Up Kim, Han Ah Lee and 1 more

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical and molecular hepatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ji Won HanThe Catholic University Liver Research Center, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Hee Yeon KimThe Catholic University Liver Research Center, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Jung Hwan YuDepartment of Internal Medicine, Inha University Hospital, Inha University School of Medicine, Incheon, Korea.
Mi Na KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Young Eun ChonDepartment of Gastroenterology, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam, Korea.
Ji Hyun AnDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Guri, Korea.
Young-Joo JinDepartment of Internal Medicine, Inha University Hospital, Inha University School of Medicine, Incheon, Korea.
Miyoung ChoiClinical Evidence Research, National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency (NECA), Seoul, Korea.
Seung Up KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Han Ah LeeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Dae Won JunDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Funding

Korea Health Industry Development InstituteMinistry of EducationMinistry of Health and Welfare HI23C1489National Research Foundation of Korea 2022R1I1A1A01063636
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimsThe Fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4) is a noninvasive test widely used to rule out advanced liver fibrosis (AF) in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). However, its diagnostic accuracy in NAFLD patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is controversial due to the high prevalence of AF in this population.

methodsResearch focusing on the diagnostic accuracy of FIB-4 for liver fibrosis as validated by liver histology in NAFLD patients with T2DM was included, and 12 studies (n=5,624) were finally included in the meta-analysis. Sensitivity, specificity, hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC), positive predictive values (PPVs), and negative predictive values (NPVs) at low cutoffs (1.3-1.67) and high cutoffs (2.67-3.25) for ruling in and out AF were calculated.

resultsAt low cutoffs, the meta-analysis revealed a sensitivity of 0.74, specificity of 0.62, and HSROC of 0.75. At high cutoffs, the analysis showed a sensitivity of 0.33, specificity of 0.92, and HSROC of 0.85, suggesting FIB-4 as useful for identifying or excluding AF. In subgroup analyses, high mean age and F3 prevalence were associated with lower sensitivity. The calculated NPV and PPV were 0.82 and 0.49 at low cutoffs, whereas the NPV was 0.28 and the PPV was 0.70 at high cutoffs. There were insufficient estimated NPVs <0.90 at a hypothesized prevalence of AF >30% at an FIB-4 cutoff range of 1.3-1.67.

conclusionCollectively, FIB-4 has moderate diagnostic accuracy for identifying or excluding AF in NAFLD patients with T2DM, but more evidence must be accumulated due to the limited number of currently reported studies and their heterogeneity.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Liver CirrhosisNon-alcoholic Fatty Liver DiseaseHumansLiverROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificitySeverity of Illness IndexDiabetesFIB-4Meta-analysisNAFLD

Identifiers

PMID39048521
PMCPMC11493353

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.