Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39049990›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in computational neuroscience2024

Purkinje cell models: past, present and future.

Elías Mateo Fernández Santoro, Arun Karim, Pascal Warnaar, Chris I De Zeeuw, Aleksandra Badura, Mario Negrello

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. The Cerebellar Connectome.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elías Mateo Fernández SantoroDepartment of Neuroscience, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Arun KarimDepartment of Neuroscience, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Pascal WarnaarDepartment of Neuroscience, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Chris I De ZeeuwDepartment of Neuroscience, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Aleksandra BaduraDepartment of Neuroscience, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Mario NegrelloDepartment of Neuroscience, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The investigation of the dynamics of Purkinje cell (PC) activity is crucial to unravel the role of the cerebellum in motor control, learning and cognitive processes. Within the cerebellar cortex (CC), these neurons receive all the incoming sensory and motor information, transform it and generate the entire cerebellar output. The relatively homogenous and repetitive structure of the CC, common to all vertebrate species, suggests a single computation mechanism shared across all PCs. While PC models have been developed since the 70's, a comprehensive review of contemporary models is currently lacking. Here, we provide an overview of PC models, ranging from the ones focused on single cell intracellular PC dynamics, through complex models which include synaptic and extrasynaptic inputs. We review how PC models can reproduce physiological activity of the neuron, including firing patterns, current and multistable dynamics, plateau potentials, calcium signaling, intrinsic and synaptic plasticity and input/output computations. We consider models focusing both on somatic and on dendritic computations. Our review provides a critical performance analysis of PC models with respect to known physiological data. We expect our synthesis to be useful in guiding future development of computational models that capture real-life PC dynamics in the context of cerebellar computations.

Indexed as

cerebellumclimbing fiberscomputational modelsion channelsneuraldynamicsneuron modelPurkinje cellsynaptic plasticity

Identifiers

PMID39049990
PMCPMC11266113

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.