ArticleBiochemistry and biophysics reports2024
In silico identification of putative druggable pockets in PRL3, a significant oncology target.
Article in Biochemistry and biophysics reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Computational approaches to druggable site identification: Current status and future perspective.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2026Review
- PRL-3: unveiling a new horizon in cancer therapy.Acta pharmacologica Sinica · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Protein tyrosine phosphatases (PTP) have emerged as targets in diseases characterized by aberrant phosphorylations such as cancers. The activity of the phosphatase of regenerating liver 3, PRL3, has been linked to several oncogenic and metastatic pathways, particularly in breast, ovarian, colorectal, and blood cancers. Development of small molecules that directly target PRL3, however, has been challenging. This is partly due to the lack of structural information on how PRL3 interacts with its inhibitors. Here, computational methods are used to bridge this gap by evaluating the druggability of PRL3. In particular, web-based pocket prediction tools, DoGSite3 and FTMap, were used to identify binding pockets using structures of PRL3 currently available in the Protein Data Bank. Druggability assessment by molecular dynamics simulations with probes was also performed to validate these results and to predict the strength of binding in the identified pockets. While several druggable pockets were identified, those in the closed conformation show more promise given their volume and depth. These two pockets flank the active site loops and roughly correspond to pockets predicted by molecular docking in previous papers. Notably, druggability simulations predict the possibility of low nanomolar affinity inhibitors in these sites implying the potential to identify highly potent small molecule inhibitors for PRL3. Putative pockets identified here can be leveraged for high-throughput virtual screening to further accelerate the drug discovery against PRL3 and development of PRL3-directed therapeutics.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.