Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39050763›Full record

ReviewEvolutionary applications2024

The evolutionary consequences of interactions between the epigenome, the genome and the environment.

Pierre Baduel, Iris Sammarco, Rowan Barrett, Marta Coronado-Zamora, Amélie Crespel, Bárbara Díez-Rodríguez, Janay Fox, Dario Galanti, Josefa González, Alexander Jueterbock and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Evolutionary applications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Pierre BaduelInstitut de Biologie de l'Ecole Normale Supérieure PSL University, CNRS Paris France.
Iris SammarcoInstitute of Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences Průhonice Czechia.
Rowan BarrettRedpath Museum and Department of Biology McGill University Montreal Canada.
Marta Coronado-ZamoraInstitute of Evolutionary Biology CSIC, UPF Barcelona Spain.
Amélie CrespelDepartment of Biology University of Turku Turku Finland.
Bárbara Díez-RodríguezNatural Resources and Climate Area CARTIF Technology Centre Valladolid Spain.
Janay FoxRedpath Museum and Department of Biology McGill University Montreal Canada.
Dario GalantiInstitute of Evolution and Ecology (EvE) University of Tuebingen Tübingen Germany.
Josefa GonzálezInstitute of Evolutionary Biology CSIC, UPF Barcelona Spain.
Alexander JueterbockAlgal and Microbial Biotechnology Division, Faculty of Biosciences and Aquaculture Nord University Bodø Norway.
Eric WoottonRedpath Museum and Department of Biology McGill University Montreal Canada.
Ewan HarneyInstitute of Evolutionary Biology CSIC, UPF Barcelona Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0680-3253

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The epigenome is the suite of interacting chemical marks and molecules that helps to shape patterns of development, phenotypic plasticity and gene regulation, in part due to its responsiveness to environmental stimuli. There is increasing interest in understanding the functional and evolutionary importance of this sensitivity under ecologically realistic conditions. Observations that epigenetic variation abounds in natural populations have prompted speculation that it may facilitate evolutionary responses to rapid environmental perturbations, such as those occurring under climate change. A frequent point of contention is whether epigenetic variants reflect genetic variation or are independent of it. The genome and epigenome often appear tightly linked and interdependent. While many epigenetic changes are genetically determined, the converse is also true, with DNA sequence changes influenced by the presence of epigenetic marks. Understanding how the epigenome, genome and environment interact with one another is therefore an essential step in explaining the broader evolutionary consequences of epigenomic variation. Drawing on results from experimental and comparative studies carried out in diverse plant and animal species, we synthesize our current understanding of how these factors interact to shape phenotypic variation in natural populations, with a focus on identifying similarities and differences between taxonomic groups. We describe the main components of the epigenome and how they vary within and between taxa. We review how variation in the epigenome interacts with genetic features and environmental determinants, with a focus on the role of transposable elements (TEs) in integrating the epigenome, genome and environment. And we look at recent studies investigating the functional and evolutionary consequences of these interactions. Although epigenetic differentiation in nature is likely often a result of drift or selection on stochastic epimutations, there is growing evidence that a significant fraction of it can be stably inherited and could therefore contribute to evolution independently of genetic change.

Indexed as

DNA methylationepigeneticsgene–environment interactionsnatural populationstransgenerational effectstransposable elements

Identifiers

PMID39050763
PMCPMC11266121

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.