Evidence mapPaperPMID 39051249Full record

ReviewGeriatrics (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Existing Digital Health Technology Index Summary Report for Older Adults Living with Neurocognitive Disorders (Mild and Major) and Their Informal Caregivers: An Environmental Scan.

Ambily Jose, Maxime Sasseville, Ellen Gorus, Anik Giguère, Anne Bourbonnais, Samira Abbasgholizadeh Rahimi, Clémence Balley, Ronald Buyl, Marie-Pierre Gagnon

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ambily JoseVITAM Research Center in Sustainable Health, Quebec City, QC G1J 2G1, Canada.
Maxime SassevilleVITAM Research Center in Sustainable Health, Quebec City, QC G1J 2G1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1694-1414
Ellen GorusDepartment of Gerontology, Frailty in Ageing Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1090 Brussels, Belgium.
Anik GiguèreVITAM Research Center in Sustainable Health, Quebec City, QC G1J 2G1, Canada.
Anne BourbonnaisFaculty of Nursing, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC H3T 1J4, Canada.
Samira Abbasgholizadeh RahimiDepartment of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 0G4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3781-1360
Clémence BalleyVITAM Research Center in Sustainable Health, Quebec City, QC G1J 2G1, Canada.
Ronald BuylDepartment of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1090 Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-6598-9505
Marie-Pierre GagnonVITAM Research Center in Sustainable Health, Quebec City, QC G1J 2G1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0782-5457

Funding

Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Nature et Technologies G0D8518NResearch Foundation - Flanders G0D8518N
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digital health has added numerous promising solutions to enhance the health and wellness of people with neurocognitive disorders (NCDs) and their informal caregivers. (1) Background: It is important to obtain a comprehensive view of currently available technologies, their outcomes, and conditions of success to inform recommendations regarding digital health solutions for people with NCDs and their caregivers. This environmental scan was performed to identify the features of existing digital health solutions relevant to the targeted population. This work reviews currently available digital health solutions and their related characteristics to develop a decision support tool for older adults living with mild or major neurocognitive disorders and their informal caregivers. This knowledge will aid the development of a decision support tool to assist older adults and their informal caregivers in their search for adequate digital health solutions according to their needs and preferences based on trustable information. (2) Methods: We conducted an environmental scan to identify digital health solutions from a systematic review and targeted searches in the grey literature covering the regions of Canada and Europe. Technological tools were scanned based on a preformatted extraction grid. We assessed their relevance based on selected attributes and summarized the findings. (3) Results: We identified 100 available digital health solutions. The majority (56%) were not specific to NCDs. Only 28% provided scientific evidence of their effectiveness. Remote patient care, movement tracking, and cognitive exercises were the most common purposes of digital health solutions. Most solutions were presented as decision aid tools, pill dispensers, apps, web, or a combination of these platforms. (4) Conclusions: This environmental scan allowed for identifying current digital health solutions for older adults with mild or major neurocognitive disorders and their informal caregivers. Findings from the environmental scan highlight the need for additional approaches to strengthen digital health interventions for the well-being of older adults with mild and major NCDs and their informal and formal healthcare providers.

Indexed as

agingassisted livingassistive technologycognitive assistancecognitive impairmentdementiadigital healthe-healthenvironmental scan

Identifiers

PMID39051249
PMCPMC11270236

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.