ArticleClinical and experimental medicine2024
Deciphering the prognostic role of endoplasmic reticulum stress in lung adenocarcinoma: integrating prognostic prediction and immunotherapy strategies.
Article in Clinical and experimental medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical Significance of RBM15 in Gastric Cancer: A Multi-Database Validation.Current medicinal chemistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Endoplasmic reticulum stress (ERS) is a critical factor influencing lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) progression and patient outcomes. In this study, we analyzed gene expression data from LUAD samples sourced from The Cancer Genomic Atlas and Gene Expression Omnibus databases. Utilizing advanced statistical methods including LASSO and Cox regression, we developed a ERS-associated signature (ERAS) based on ten ERS-related genes. This model stratified patients into high- and low-risk groups, with the high-risk group exhibiting decreased survival rates, elevated tumor mutational burden, and heightened chemotherapy sensitivity. Additionally, we observed lower immune and ESTIMATE scores in the high-ERAS group, indicating a potentially compromised immune response. Experimental validation through quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction confirmed the utility of our model. Furthermore, we constructed a nomogram to predict 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates, providing clinicians with a valuable tool for personalized patient management. In conclusion, our study demonstrates the efficacy of the ERAS in identifying high-ERAS LUAD patients, offering promising implications for improved prognostication and treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.