Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39052559›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2024

Bayesian model selection for COVID-19 pandemic state estimation using extended Kalman filters: Case study for Saudi Arabia.

Lamia Alyami, Saptarshi Das, Stuart Townley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lamia AlyamiCentre for Environmental Mathematics, Faculty of Environment, Science and Economy, University of Exeter, Penryn Campus, Penryn, United Kingdom.
Saptarshi DasCentre for Environmental Mathematics, Faculty of Environment, Science and Economy, University of Exeter, Penryn Campus, Penryn, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8394-5303
Stuart TownleyCentre for Environmental Mathematics, Faculty of Environment, Science and Economy, University of Exeter, Penryn Campus, Penryn, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantifying the uncertainty in data-driven mechanistic models is fundamental in public health applications. COVID-19 is a complex disease that had a significant impact on global health and economies. Several mathematical models were used to understand the complexity of the transmission dynamics under different hypotheses to support the decision-making for disease management. This paper highlights various scenarios of a 6D epidemiological model known as SEIQRD (Susceptible-Exposed-Infected-Quarantined-Recovered-Deceased) to evaluate its effectiveness in prediction and state estimation during the spread of COVID-19 pandemic. Then we investigate the suitability of the classical 4D epidemiological model known as SIRD (Susceptible-Infected-Recovered-Deceased) in the long-term behaviour in order to make a comparison between these models. The primary aim of this paper is to establish a foundational basis for the validity and epidemiological model comparisons in long-term behaviour which may help identify the degree of model complexity that is required based on two approaches viz. the Bayesian inference employing the nested sampling algorithm and recursive state estimation utilizing the Extended Kalman Filter (EKF). Our approach acknowledges the potential imperfections and uncertainties inherent in compartmental epidemiological models. By integrating our proposed methodology, these models can consistently generate predictions closely aligned with the observed data on active cases and deaths. This framework, implemented within the EKF algorithm, offers a robust tool for addressing future, unknown pandemics. Moreover, we present a systematic methodology for time-varying parameter estimation along with uncertainty quantification using Saudi Arabia COVID-19 data and obtain the credible confidence intervals of the epidemiological nonlinear dynamical system model parameters.

Identifiers

PMID39052559
PMCPMC11271923

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.