SynthesisPloS one2024
Predictive value of bile acids as metabolite biomarkers for gallstone disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Metabolic Determinants of Recurrent Choledocholithiasis: Time to Move Beyond the Endoscope.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Article
- Association of the Triglyceride-Glucose Index With Gallstone Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Review
- Development and validation of gallstone disease risk factor identification model: a cross-sectional study in Western China.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe profiles of bile acids (BAs) in patients with gallstone disease (GSD) have been found to be altered markedly though in an inconsistent pattern. This study aims to characterize the variation of the BA profiles in GSD patients, thereby to discover the potential metabolite biomarkers for earlier detection of GSD.
methodsLiterature search of eight electronic database in both English and Chinese was completed on May 11, 2023. The qualitative and quantitative reviews were performed to summarize the changes of BA profiles in GSD patients compared with healthy subjects. The concentrations of BAs were adopted as the primary outcomes and the weighted mean differences (WMDs) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were generated by random-effects meta-analysis models.
resultsA total of 30 studies were enrolled which included 2313 participants and reported the 39 BAs or their ratios. Qualitative review demonstrated serum Taurocholic Acid (TCA), Glycochenodeoxycholic acid (GCDCA), Glycocholic acid (GCA), Taurochenodeoxycholic acid (TCDCA), Glycodeoxycholic acid (GDCA) and Deoxycholic acid (DCA) were significantly increased in GSD patients compared with healthy subjects. Meta analysis was performed in 16 studies and showed that serum Total BAs (TBA) (WMD = 1.36μmol/L, 95%CI = 0.33; 2.4) was elevated however bile TBA (WMD = -36.96mmol/L, 95%CI = -52.32; -21.6) was declined in GSD patients. GCA (WMD = 0.83μmol/L, 95%CI = 0.06; 1.6) and TCA (WMD = 0.51μmol/L; 95%CI = 0.18; 0.85) were both increased in serum sample; TCDCA (WMD = 2.64mmol/L, 95%CI = 0.16; 5.12) was rising, however GCDCA (WMD = -13.82mmol/L, 95%CI = -21.86; -5.78) was falling in bile sample of GSD patients. The level of serum DCA in the GSD patients was found to be increased by using chromatography, yet decreased by chromatography mass spectrometry.
conclusionThe profiles of BAs demonstrated distinctive changes in GSD patients compared with healthy control subjects. Serum GCA, TCA and GCDCA, as the typically variant BAs, presented as a potential marker for earlier diagnosis of GSD, which could facilitate early prophylactic intervention. Yet, further validation of these biomarkers by longitudinal studies is still warranted in the future. PROSPERO registration number CRD42022339649.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.