Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39053952›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Determinants of women's preferences for surgical versus conservative management for pelvic organ prolapse: a survey-based study from Italy.

Amerigo Ferrari, Nicola Bellè, Andrea Giannini, Tommaso Simoncini, Milena Vainieri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. National Survey on the Management of Genital Prolapse in Italy.International journal of women's health · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Amerigo FerrariInstitute of Management, MeS (Management and Health) Laboratory, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy amerigo.ferrari@santannapisa.it.ORCID 0000-0002-5309-2813
Nicola BellèInstitute of Management, MeS (Management and Health) Laboratory, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy.
Andrea GianniniDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Tommaso SimonciniDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Milena VainieriInstitute of Management, MeS (Management and Health) Laboratory, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0914-4487

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivePelvic organ prolapse (POP) affects 40% of women, with a 12%-19% lifetime surgical risk. Italy showed high practice variation in POP surgery, possibly impacting equity of access to healthcare services, a central goal of Beveridge-like health systems. According to the literature, unwarranted variation, influenced by physician attitudes or resource allocation, must be reduced. We aimed to identify determinants influencing women's choice when asked whether they prefer surgical or conservative POP management. DESIGN, SETTING AND POPULATION: In this nationwide prospective study, we distributed a Qualtrics questionnaire via social media to any Italian women over 18 years old who voluntarily decided to participate in the survey.

interventionA grade 3 POP scenario was presented. Women were asked how likely they would have surgery. Each woman randomly received only 1 question out of 11: 1 question was the reference question ('How likely would you have surgery?') while 10 questions contained a potential determinant influencing woman's choice ('How likely would you have surgery if…?'). OUTCOME: The outcome was the chance of choosing surgery expressed as a percentage. We analysed the effect of each factor on the outcome by using adjusted beta regression models.

resultsRespondents (n=222) opted for surgery with a median probability of 61.5%. Factors significantly increasing the chance of choosing surgery were advice from physicians, the presence of a trusted physician during hospitalisation, surgical approach with low complication rates, uterine-sparing surgery, the absence of postoperative abdominal scars and nearby hospital.

conclusionsOur findings provide health managers and policy-makers with new evidence to better understand women's decision-making and partly capture the determinants of unwarranted variation. These inputs may also be used as attributes for a future discrete choice experiment.

Indexed as

Conservative TreatmentPatient PreferencePelvic Organ ProlapseAdultAgedChoice BehaviorFemaleHumansItalyMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSurveys and Questionnaireshealth servicespublic healthqualitative researchurogynaecology

Identifiers

PMID39053952
PMCPMC11284879

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.