ArticleAnnals of medicine2024
Identification of
Article in Annals of medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine-Learning-Derived, Mechanistically Informed Transcriptomic Signature to Diagnose Active Tuberculosis and Guide Host-Directed Therapy.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Integration of Bioinformatics and Machine Learning Strategies Identifies Ferroptosis and Immune Infiltration Signatures in Peri-Implantitis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- The Association of Latent Tuberculosis Infection with Air Pollutant Exposure, Meteorological and Other Factors: A Retrospective Study in Eastern China of College Students.Infection and drug resistance · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCurrent diagnostic methods cannot effectively distinguish between latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) and active tuberculosis (ATB). This study aims to explore novel non-invasive diagnostic biomarkers for LTBI and to elucidate possible molecular mechanisms of LTBI pathogenesis.
methodsThree GEO datasets (GSE19439, GSE19444, and GSE62525) were utilized to analyze the differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Functional enrichment studies were then performed on these DEGs. To ascertain potential diagnostic biomarkers, we utilized two different machine learning techniques: LASSO and RF. ROC curves were constructed in both the training and validation datasets to assess the diagnostic efficacy. The expression of identified biomarkers was verified by RT-qPCR in our own Chinese cohort. Using CIBERSORT, we estimated the abundances of 22 immune cell types in LTBI group, and subsequently analyzed the relationship between biomarker expression and immune cell infiltration.
results166 DEGs were identified between ATB and LTBI groups, which are primarily associated with immune responses, inflammatory signaling pathways, and infection factors. Following that, 22 candidate diagnostic biomarkers for LTBI were selected in the machine learning process. Three up-regulated genes,
conclusions
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.