ArticleCurrent developments in nutrition2024
Balanced Energy Protein Supplementation in Pregnancy: Adherence and Acceptability among Pregnant Women in Rural Ethiopia.
Article in Current developments in nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Balanced energy protein (BEP) supplementation in pregnant women in low-and middle-income countries may reduce the risk of stillbirth and low birth weight. Objectives: The objective of this study was to assess the adherence to and acceptability of a corn-soy blend (CSB) BEP product among pregnant women in rural Ethiopia. Methods: This formative study was conducted from October to November 2018 among pregnant women in the rural Amhara region of Ethiopia prior to initiation of a clinical effectiveness study (ISRCTN: 15116516). We assessed adherence and acceptability of a micronutrient-fortified CSB BEP supplement among 40 pregnant women during a 4-wk utilization period. Acceptability was assessed using a 7-point Likert-style scale about the hedonic characteristics of the BEP product at 2 wk and 4 wk. Adherence was assessed by weekly monitoring and empty sachet counts for BEP consumption over 4 wk. Results: Adherence to the BEP was, on average, 89% over the month-long pilot. The BEP product was rated favorably (mean Likert score >6 of 7) for the following domains: color, taste, odor, and likeability at mid and endpoints. Women found the product convenient to eat [mean (standard deviation [SD] = 5.9 (1.0))] and filling (mean (SD) = 6.1 (1.5) out of 7). Scores on acceptability and perception of the product remained stable throughout the duration of use. A majority of women (63%) reported consuming the BEP as a snack to supplement meals and splitting the serving over 2 or more sessions (68%). A quarter of respondents reported sharing the supplement with family members. Conclusions: Adherence and acceptability of the CSB BEP product were high among this population in rural Amhara, Ethiopia. This formative data was important to select the final product and shape the counseling and delivery of BEP in the parent study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.