ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental hepatology
Machine-Learning-Based Identification of Key Feature RNA-Signature Linked to Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Article in Journal of clinical and experimental hepatology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Serum biomarkers as personalised medicine for diagnostic and therapeutic approaches of hepatocellular carcinoma.Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute · 2026Review
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Molecular Diagnosis and Perspectives for Therapy.Journal of clinical and experimental hepatologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third prime cause of malignancy-related mortality worldwide. Early and accurate identification of HCC is crucial for good prognosis, efficacy of therapy, and survival rates of the patients. We aimed to develop a machine-learning model incorporating differentially expressed RNA signatures with laboratory parameters to construct an RNA signature-based diagnostic model for HCC. Methods: We have used five classifiers (KNN, RF, SVM, LGBM, and DNNs) to predict the liver disease (HCC). The classifiers were trained on 187 samples and then tested on 80 samples. The model included 22 features (age, sex, smoking, cirrhosis, non-cirrhosis, albumin, ALT, AST bilirubin (total and direct), INR, AFP, HBV Ag, HCV Abs, RQmiR-1298, RQmiR-1262, RQmiR-106b-3p, RQmRNARAB11A, and RQSTAT1, RQmRNAATG12, RQLnc-WRAP53, RQLncRNA- RP11-513I15.6). Results: LGBM achieved the highest accuracy of 98.75% in predicting HCC among all models surpassing Random Forest (96.25%), DNN (91.25%), SVC (88.75%), and KNN (87.50%). Conclusion: Our machine-learning model incorporating the expression data of RAB11A/STAT1/ATG12/miR-1262/miR-1298/miR-106b-3p/lncRNA-RP11-513I15.6/lncRNA-WRAP53 signature and clinical data represents a potential novel diagnostic model for HCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.