Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39056477›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2024

DeepComBat: A statistically motivated, hyperparameter-robust, deep learning approach to harmonization of neuroimaging data.

Fengling Hu, Alfredo Lucas, Andrew A Chen, Kyle Coleman, Hannah Horng, Raymond W S Ng, Nicholas J Tustison, Kathryn A Davis, Haochang Shou, Mingyao Li and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Advances in artificial intelligence for neuroimaging.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Calibration of MRI-based reference intervals to new samples.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Fengling HuPenn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Endeavor (PennSIVE), Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1081-5038
Alfredo LucasCenter for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, Department of Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9439-735X
Andrew A ChenPenn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Endeavor (PennSIVE), Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Kyle ColemanStatistical Center for Single-Cell and Spatial Genomics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Hannah HorngPenn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Endeavor (PennSIVE), Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Raymond W S NgPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Nicholas J TustisonDepartment of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9418-5103
Kathryn A DavisCenter for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, Department of Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Haochang ShouPenn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Endeavor (PennSIVE), Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Mingyao LiStatistical Center for Single-Cell and Spatial Genomics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Russell T ShinoharaPenn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Endeavor (PennSIVE), Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

Funding

Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative - SupplementU01AG024904 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE RES &EDUC · PI WEINER, MICHAEL W · 2004 to 2015
$121.0M
Statistical Methods for Multilevel Multivariate Functional StudiesR01NS060910 · NINDS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Ciprian M Crainiceanu · 2009 to 2026
$8.3M
The Neuroimaging Brain Chart Software SuiteU24NS130411 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Christos Davatzikos, Yong Fan · 2023 to 2026
$3.7M
Optimized Intracranial EEG Targeting in Focal Epilepsy based upon Neuroimaging ConnectomicsR01NS116504 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DAVIS, KATHRYN ADAMIAK · 2021 to 2025
$3.3M
Statistical methods for large and complex databases of ultra-high-dimensionalR01NS085211 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI SHINOHARA, RUSSELL TAKESHI · 2013 to 2017
$1.8M
National Multiple Sclerosis Society RG-1707-28586NIA NIH HHS U01 AG024904NIBIB NIH HHSNIH HHS U01AG024904NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS060910NINDS NIH HHS R01NS060910NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS085211NINDS NIH HHS R01NS085211NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS116504NINDS NIH HHS U24 NS130411University of PennsylvaniaU.S. Department of Defense W81XWH-12-2-0012
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuroimaging data acquired using multiple scanners or protocols are increasingly available. However, such data exhibit technical artifacts across batches which introduce confounding and decrease reproducibility. This is especially true when multi-batch data are analyzed using complex downstream models which are more likely to pick up on and implicitly incorporate batch-related information. Previously proposed image harmonization methods have sought to remove these batch effects; however, batch effects remain detectable in the data after applying these methods. We present DeepComBat, a deep learning harmonization method based on a conditional variational autoencoder and the ComBat method. DeepComBat combines the strengths of statistical and deep learning methods in order to account for the multivariate relationships between features while simultaneously relaxing strong assumptions made by previous deep learning harmonization methods. As a result, DeepComBat can perform multivariate harmonization while preserving data structure and avoiding the introduction of synthetic artifacts. We apply this method to cortical thickness measurements from a cognitive-aging cohort and show DeepComBat qualitatively and quantitatively outperforms existing methods in removing batch effects while preserving biological heterogeneity. Additionally, DeepComBat provides a new perspective for statistically motivated deep learning harmonization methods.

Indexed as

Deep LearningImage Processing, Computer-AssistedNeuroimagingAgedCerebral CortexFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaledeep learningimage harmonizationneuroimagingreproducibility

Identifiers

PMID39056477
PMCPMC11273293

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.