Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39057760›Full record

SynthesisPathogens (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Difference in the Intestinal Microbiota between Breastfeed Infants and Infants Fed with Artificial Milk: A Systematic Review.

Francesco Inchingolo, Angelo Michele Inchingolo, Giulia Latini, Laura Ferrante, Elisabetta de Ruvo, Merigrazia Campanelli, Marialuisa Longo, Andrea Palermo, Alessio Danilo Inchingolo, Gianna Dipalma

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Francesco InchingoloInterdisciplinary Department of Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3797-5883
Angelo Michele InchingoloInterdisciplinary Department of Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0104-6337
Giulia LatiniInterdisciplinary Department of Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124 Bari, Italy.
Laura FerranteInterdisciplinary Department of Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0009-0007-1494-3519
Elisabetta de RuvoInterdisciplinary Department of Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124 Bari, Italy.
Merigrazia CampanelliInterdisciplinary Department of Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8445-5384
Marialuisa LongoInterdisciplinary Department of Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124 Bari, Italy.
Andrea PalermoCollege of Medicine and Dentistry, Birmingham B4 6BN, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3288-490X
Alessio Danilo InchingoloInterdisciplinary Department of Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6366-1039
Gianna DipalmaInterdisciplinary Department of Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5947-8987

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The gut microbiota (GM) plays a crucial role in human health, particularly during the first years of life. Differences in GM between breastfed and formula (F)-fed infants may influence long-term health outcomes. This systematic review aims to compare the gut microbiota of breastfed infants with that of F-fed infants and to evaluate the clinical implications of these differences. We searched databases on Scopus, Web of Science, and Pubmed with the following keywords: "gut microbiota", "gut microbiome", and "neonatal milk". The inclusion criteria were articles relating to the analysis of the intestinal microbiome of newborns in relation to the type of nutrition, clinical studies or case series, excluding reviews, meta-analyses, animal models, and in vitro studies. The screening phase ended with the selection of 13 publications for this work. Breastfed infants showed higher levels of beneficial bacteria such as Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus, while F-fed infants had a higher prevalence of potentially pathogenic bacteria, including Clostridium difficile and Enterobacteriaceae. Infant feeding type influences the composition of oral GM significantly. Breastfeeding promotes a healthier and more diverse microbial ecosystem, which may offer protective health benefits. Future research should explore strategies to improve the GM of F-fed infants and understand the long-term health implications.

Indexed as

Breast FeedingGastrointestinal MicrobiomeInfant FormulaBacteriaHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMilk, Humanbreastfeedingformula feedinggut microbiotaintestinal microbiomeneonatal milk

Identifiers

PMID39057760
PMCPMC11280328

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.