Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39061037›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2024

Pharmacists' attitudes towards interprofessional collaboration to optimise medication use in older patients in Switzerland: a survey study.

Renata Vidonscky Lüthold, Damien Cateau, Stephen Philip Jenkinson, Sven Streit, Katharina Tabea Jungo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Renata Vidonscky LütholdInstitute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, 3012, Bern, Switzerland.
Damien CateauCentre for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Stephen Philip JenkinsonInstitute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, 3012, Bern, Switzerland.
Sven Streit *Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, 3012, Bern, Switzerland.
Katharina Tabea Jungo *Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, 3012, Bern, Switzerland. katharina.jungo@protonmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCollaboration between physicians and pharmacists facilitates the conduct of medication optimisation efforts. In the context of deprescribing, pharmacists' roles are often described as making deprescribing recommendations to physicians. Little is known about factors associated with pharmacists' willingness to make deprescribing recommendations and their interprofessional collaboration with physicians in Swiss primary care settings.

objectiveTo explore pharmacists' perspectives on medication optimisation and deprescribing in older adults, and their preferences for interprofessional collaboration in Swiss primary care settings.

methodsIn this cross-sectional study, a random sample of 1000 pharmacist members of the Swiss Pharmacists Association pharmaSuisse was invited to participate in a survey on medication optimisation, deprescribing, and interprofessional collaboration. The survey contained three case vignettes of multimorbid patients with polypharmacy aged ≥ 80 years old, with different levels of dependency in activities in daily living (ADL) and cardiovascular disease (CVD). For each case vignette, pharmacists were asked if and which medications they would deprescribe. We calculated proportions of pharmacists' willingness to deprescribe by case vignette and performed a multilevel logistic regression to assess associations between CVD, ADL, and willingness to deprescribe.

resultsOne hundred thirty-eight (14%) pharmacists responded to the survey: 113 (82%) were female, their mean age was 44 years (SD = 11), and 66% (n = 77) reported having never received any specific training on how to conduct structured medication reviews. Eighty-three (72%) pharmacists reported to be confident in identifying deprescribing opportunities. All pharmacists were willing to deprescribe ≥ 1 medication in all vignettes. Patients with CVD were at lower odds of having medications deprescribed (OR = 0.27, 95%CI 0.21 to 0.36). Willingness to deprescribe was lower with higher dependency in ADL (medium versus low dependency: OR = 0.68, 95%CI 0.54 to 0.87, high versus low dependency: OR = 0.72, 95%CI 0.56 to 0.91). However, the effect of dependency in ADL on willingness to deprescribe was significantly modified by the history of CVD. One hundred five pharmacists (97%) reported to interact with physicians to clarify questions regarding prescriptions at least once a week and 88 (81%) wished to be more involved in deprescribing and medication review.

conclusionPharmacists were willing to make deprescribing suggestions for older patients with polypharmacy, but two-thirds reported having received no formal training on how to perform structured medication reviews. Pharmacists would like to be more involved in the process of medication review and deprescribing, which should be leveraged in the context of Swiss primary care settings.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelDeprescriptionsInterprofessional RelationsPharmacistsPolypharmacyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCooperative BehaviorCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrimary Health CareSurveys and QuestionnairesDeprescribingInterprofessional collaborationMedication optimizationMedication reviewOlder adultsPharmacistsPolypharmacy

Identifiers

PMID39061037
PMCPMC11282592

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.