Evidence mapPaperPMID 39061107Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's research & therapy2024

Identification of profiles associated with conversions between the Alzheimer's disease stages, using a machine learning approach.

Virginie Dauphinot, Marie Laurent, Martin Prodel, Alexandre Civet, Alexandre Vainchtock, Claire Moutet, Pierre Krolak-Salmon, Antoine Garnier-Crussard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's research & therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Virginie DauphinotClinical and Research Memory Centre, Lyon Institute For Aging, Charpennes Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 27 rue Gabriel Péri, Villeurbanne, Lyon, 69100, France. virginie.dauphinot@chu-lyon.fr.
Marie LaurentHeva, Lyon, France.
Martin ProdelHeva, Lyon, France.
Alexandre CivetRoche France S.A.S, Boulogne Billancourt, France.
Alexandre VainchtockHeva, Lyon, France.
Claire MoutetClinical and Research Memory Centre, Lyon Institute For Aging, Charpennes Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 27 rue Gabriel Péri, Villeurbanne, Lyon, 69100, France.
Pierre Krolak-SalmonClinical and Research Memory Centre, Lyon Institute For Aging, Charpennes Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 27 rue Gabriel Péri, Villeurbanne, Lyon, 69100, France.
Antoine Garnier-CrussardClinical and Research Memory Centre, Lyon Institute For Aging, Charpennes Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 27 rue Gabriel Péri, Villeurbanne, Lyon, 69100, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe identification of factors involved in the conversion across the different Alzheimer's disease (AD) stages is crucial to prevent or slow the disease progression. We aimed to assess the factors and their combination associated with the conversion across the AD stages, from mild cognitive impairment to dementia, at a mild, moderate or severe stage and to identify profiles associated with earliest/latest conversion across the AD stages.

methodsIn this study conducted on the real-life MEMORA cohort data collected from January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2019, three cohorts were selected depending on the baseline neurocognitive stage from a consecutive sample of patients attending a memory center, aged between 50 and 90 years old, with a diagnosis of AD during the follow-up, and with at least 2 visits at 6 months to 1 year of interval. A machine learning approach was used to assess the relationship between factors including socio-demographic characteristics, comorbidities and history of diseases, prescription of drugs, and geriatric hospitalizations, and the censored time to conversion from mild cognitive impairment to AD dementia, from the mild stage of dementia to the moderate or severe stages of AD dementia, and from the moderate stage of AD dementia to the severe stage. Profiles of earliest/latest conversion compared to median time to conversion across stages were identified. The median time to conversion was estimated with a Kaplan-Meier estimator.

resultsOverall, 2891 patients were included (mean age 77±9 years old, 65% women). The median time of follow-up was 28 months for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) patients, 33 months for mild AD dementia and 30 months for moderate AD dementia. Among the 1264 patients at MCI stage, 61% converted to AD dementia (median time to conversion: 25 months). Among the 1142 patients with mild AD dementia, 59% converted to moderate/severe stage (median time: 23 months) and among the 1332 patients with moderate AD dementia, 23% converted to severe stage (Q3 time to conversion: 22 months). Among the studied factors, cardiovascular comorbidities, anxiety, social isolation, osteoporosis, and hearing disorders were identified as being associated with earlier conversion across stages. Symptomatic treatment i.e. cholinesterase inhibitors for AD was associated with later conversion from mild stage of dementia to moderate/severe stages.

conclusionThis study based on a machine learning approach allowed to identify potentially modifiable factors associated with conversion across AD stages for which timely interventions may be implemented to delay disease progression.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseCognitive DysfunctionDisease ProgressionMachine LearningAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsSeverity of Illness IndexAlzheimer’s diseaseConversionDecision treeDementiaMachine learningMild cognitive impairment

Identifiers

PMID39061107
PMCPMC11282744

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.