Evidence mapPaperPMID 39061987Full record

ArticleBiomedicines2024

Gender-Related Difference in Skin Oxygenation in Young Patients with Uncomplicated Type 1 Diabetes.

Jolanta Neubauer-Geryk, Małgorzata Myśliwiec, Leszek Bieniaszewski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedicines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jolanta Neubauer-GerykClinical Physiology Unit, Medical Simulation Centre, Medical University of Gdańsk, 80-210 Gdańsk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-9175-3862
Małgorzata MyśliwiecDepartment of Pediatrics, Diabetology and Endocrinology, Medical University of Gdańsk, 80-211 Gdańsk, Poland.
Leszek BieniaszewskiClinical Physiology Unit, Medical Simulation Centre, Medical University of Gdańsk, 80-210 Gdańsk, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gender, through genetic, epigenetic and hormonal regulation, is an important modifier of the physiological mechanisms and clinical course of diseases. In diabetes mellitus, there are gender differences in incidence, prevalence, morbidity, and mortality. This disease also has an impact on the microvascular function. Therefore, this cross-sectional study was designed to investigate how gender affects the cutaneous microcirculation. We hypothesized that gender should be an important factor in the interpretation of capillaroscopy and transcutaneous oxygen saturation results. The study group consisted of 42 boys and 55 girls, uncomplicated diabetic pediatric patients. Females (F) and males (M) did not differ in terms of age, age at onset of diabetes, or diabetes duration. Furthermore, they did not differ in metabolic parameters. The comparison showed that group F had lower BP, higher pulse, and higher HR than group M. Group F had significantly lower creatinine and hemoglobin levels than group M. In children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes without complications, there was a gender difference in microcirculatory parameters. The resting transcutaneous partial pressure of oxygen was significantly higher in females than in males. However, there were no gender-related differences in basal capillaroscopic parameters or vascular reactivity during the PORH test. Our results indicate that studies investigating the structure and function of the microcirculation should consider the role of gender in addition to known cofactors such as puberty, body mass index, physical activity, and cigarette smoking.

Indexed as

capillaroscopychildren and adolescentsgenderskin microcirculationtranscutaneous oxygen pressuretype 1 diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID39061987
PMCPMC11274177

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.