Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39062033›Full record

ArticleBiomedicines2024

Exploratory Tau PET/CT with [11C]PBB3 in Patients with Suspected Alzheimer's Disease and Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration: A Pilot Study on Correlation with PET Imaging and Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers.

Joachim Strobel, Elham Yousefzadeh-Nowshahr, Katharina Deininger, Karl Peter Bohn, Christine A F von Arnim, Markus Otto, Christoph Solbach, Sarah Anderl-Straub, Dörte Polivka, Patrick Fissler and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedicines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Joachim StrobelDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Ulm University Medical Center, 89081 Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0009-0006-0332-5478
Elham Yousefzadeh-NowshahrDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Ulm University Medical Center, 89081 Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8675-9306
Katharina DeiningerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Ulm University Medical Center, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Karl Peter BohnDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Ulm University Medical Center, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Christine A F von ArnimDepartment of Geriatrics, University Medical Center Göttingen, 37073 Göttingen, Germany.
Markus OttoDepartment of Neurology, Halle University, 06120 Halle, Germany.
Christoph SolbachDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Ulm University Medical Center, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Sarah Anderl-StraubDepartment of Neurology, Ulm University Medical Center, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Dörte PolivkaDepartment of Neurology, Ulm University Medical Center, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Patrick FisslerPsychiatric Services Thurgau (Academic Teaching Hospital of the University of Konstanz), 8596 Münsterlingen, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-7456-3098
Gerhard GlattingDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Ulm University Medical Center, 89081 Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7916-1576
Matthias W RiepeDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy II, Ulm University, 89075 Ulm, Germany.
Makoto HiguchiNational Institute of Radiological Sciences, Chiba 263-8555, Japan.
Ambros J BeerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Ulm University Medical Center, 89081 Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9042-7806
Albert LudolphDepartment of Neurology, Ulm University Medical Center, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Gordon WinterDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Ulm University Medical Center, 89081 Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8855-8057

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurately diagnosing Alzheimer's disease (AD) and frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) is challenging due to overlapping symptoms and limitations of current imaging methods. This study investigates the use of [11C]PBB3 PET/CT imaging to visualize tau pathology and improve diagnostic accuracy. Given diagnostic challenges with symptoms and conventional imaging, [11C]PBB3 PET/CT's potential to enhance accuracy was investigated by correlating tau pathology with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers, positron emission tomography (PET), computed tomography (CT), amyloid-beta, and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). We conducted [11C]PBB3 PET/CT imaging on 24 patients with suspected AD or FTLD, alongside [11C]PiB PET/CT (13 patients) and [18F]FDG PET/CT (15 patients). Visual and quantitative assessments of [11C]PBB3 uptake using standardized uptake value ratios (SUV-Rs) and correlation analyses with clinical assessments were performed. The scans revealed distinct tau accumulation patterns; 13 patients had no or faint uptake (PBB3-negative) and 11 had moderate to pronounced uptake (PBB3-positive). Significant inverse correlations were found between [11C]PBB3 SUV-Rs and MMSE scores, but not with CSF-tau or CSF-amyloid-beta levels. Here, we show that [11C]PBB3 PET/CT imaging can reveal distinct tau accumulation patterns and correlate these with cognitive impairment in neurodegenerative diseases. Our study demonstrates the potential of [11C]PBB3-PET imaging for visualizing tau pathology and assessing disease severity, offering a promising tool for enhancing diagnostic accuracy in AD and FTLD. Further research is essential to validate these findings and refine the use of tau-specific PET imaging in clinical practice, ultimately improving patient care and treatment outcomes.

Indexed as

[11C]PBB3Alzheimer’s diseaseamyloid-betacerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkerscomputed tomography (CT)frontotemporal lobar degenerationMini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)neuroimagingpositron emission tomography (PET)tauopathies

Identifiers

PMID39062033
PMCPMC11274645

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.