ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2024
Computational Insights into Reproductive Toxicity: Clustering, Mechanism Analysis, and Predictive Models.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Reproductive toxicity poses significant risks to fertility and progeny health, making its identification in pharmaceutical compounds crucial. In this study, we conducted a comprehensive in silico investigation of reproductive toxic molecules, identifying three distinct categories represented by Dimethylhydantoin, Phenol, and Dicyclohexyl phthalate. Our analysis included physicochemical properties, target prediction, and KEGG and GO pathway analyses, revealing diverse and complex mechanisms of toxicity. Given the complexity of these mechanisms, traditional molecule-target research approaches proved insufficient. Support Vector Machines (SVMs) combined with molecular descriptors achieved an accuracy of 0.85 in the test dataset, while our custom deep learning model, integrating molecular SMILES and graphs, achieved an accuracy of 0.88 in the test dataset. These models effectively predicted reproductive toxicity, highlighting the potential of computational methods in pharmaceutical safety evaluation. Our study provides a robust framework for utilizing computational methods to enhance the safety evaluation of potential pharmaceutical compounds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.