Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39064087›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2024

Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence for Cervical Vertebral Maturation Assessment-A Systematic Review.

Wojciech Kazimierczak, Maciej Jedliński, Julien Issa, Natalia Kazimierczak, Joanna Janiszewska-Olszowska, Marta Dyszkiewicz-Konwińska, Ingrid Różyło-Kalinowska, Zbigniew Serafin, Kaan Orhan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Wojciech KazimierczakDepartment of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Jagiellońska 13-15, 85-067 Bydgoszcz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-8372-0550
Maciej JedlińskiDepartment of Interdisciplinary Dentistry, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-3446-6119
Julien IssaChair of Practical Clinical Dentistry, Department of Diagnostics, Poznań University of Medical Sciences, 61-701 Poznań, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6498-7989
Natalia KazimierczakKazimierczak Private Medical Practice, Dworcowa 13/u6a, 85-009 Bydgoszcz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1850-3525
Joanna Janiszewska-OlszowskaDepartment of Interdisciplinary Dentistry, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4374-2568
Marta Dyszkiewicz-KonwińskaChair of Practical Clinical Dentistry, Department of Diagnostics, Poznań University of Medical Sciences, 61-701 Poznań, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-8069-9004
Ingrid Różyło-KalinowskaDepartment of Dental and Maxillofacial Radiodiagnostics, Medical University of Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland.
Zbigniew SerafinDepartment of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Jagiellońska 13-15, 85-067 Bydgoszcz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4307-6852
Kaan OrhanDepartment of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara University, Ankara 06500, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-6768-0176

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

artificial intelligence (AI)cervical vertebraecervical vertebral maturation assessmentlateral cephalogrammachine learningskeletal maturity

Identifiers

PMID39064087
PMCPMC11277636

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.