Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39064103›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2024

Aortic Valve Calcium Score: Applications in Clinical Practice and Scientific Research-A Narrative Review.

Paweł Gać, Arkadiusz Jaworski, Filip Grajnert, Katarzyna Kicman, Agnieszka Trejtowicz-Sutor, Konrad Witkowski, Małgorzata Poręba, Rafał Poręba

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Aortic valve assessment by cardiac tomography: application in clinical practice.Archivos peruanos de cardiologia y cirugia cardiovascular
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Paweł GaćCentre of Diagnostic Imaging, 4th Military Hospital, Rudolfa Weigla 5, 50-981 Wrocław, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8366-0239
Arkadiusz JaworskiHealthcare Team "County Hospital" in Sochaczew, Batalionow Chlopskich 3/7, 96-500 Sochaczew, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1913-9518
Filip Grajnert4th Military Hospital, Rudolfa Weigla 5, 50-981 Wrocław, Poland.ORCID 0009-0003-0912-2557
Katarzyna KicmanHealthcare Team "County Hospital" in Sochaczew, Batalionow Chlopskich 3/7, 96-500 Sochaczew, Poland.ORCID 0009-0000-7196-2088
Agnieszka Trejtowicz-SutorCentre of Diagnostic Imaging, 4th Military Hospital, Rudolfa Weigla 5, 50-981 Wrocław, Poland.
Konrad WitkowskiCentre of Diagnostic Imaging, 4th Military Hospital, Rudolfa Weigla 5, 50-981 Wrocław, Poland.
Małgorzata PorębaDepartment of Paralympic Sports, Wroclaw University of Health and Sport Sciences, Witelona 25a, 51-617 Wrocław, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4868-3088
Rafał PorębaDepartment of Internal and Occupational Diseases, Hypertension and Clinical Oncology, Wroclaw Medical University, Borowska 213, 50-556 Wrocław, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this narrative review, we investigate the essential role played by the computed tomography Aortic Valve Calcium Score (AVCS) in the cardiovascular diagnostic landscape, with a special focus on its implications for clinical practice and scientific research. Calcific aortic valve stenosis is the most prevalent type of aortic stenosis (AS) in industrialized countries, and due to the aging population, its prevalence is increasing. While transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) remains the gold standard, AVCS stands out as an essential complementary tool in evaluating patients with AS. The advantage of AVCS is its independence from flow; this allows for a more precise evaluation of patients with discordant findings in TTE. Further clinical applications of AVCS include in the assessment of patients before transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), as it helps in predicting outcomes and provides prognostic information post-TAVR. Additionally, we describe different AVCS thresholds regarding gender and the anatomical variations of the aortic valve. Finally, we discuss various scientific studies where AVCS was applied. As AVCS has some limitations, due to the pathophysiologies of AS extending beyond calcification and gender differences, scientists strive to validate contrast-enhanced AVCS. Furthermore, research on developing radiation-free methods of measuring calcium content is ongoing.

Indexed as

aortic valve calcification scoreaortic valve stenosisartificial intelligenceAVCbicuspidcalcium scoringCT-AVCechocardiographymultidetector computed tomography

Identifiers

PMID39064103
PMCPMC11277735

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.