Behavioral tests of the insulin-cholinergic-dopamine link in nucleus accumbens and inhibition by high fat-high sugar diet in male and female rats.

It was previously shown in striatal slices obtained from male rats that insulin excites cholinergic interneurons and increases dopamine (DA) release via α4β2 nicotinic receptors on DA terminals. The effect of insulin on DA release was blocked either by maintaining rats on a high sugar-high fat (HS-HF) diet that induced hyperinsulinemia and nucleus accumbens (NAc) insulin receptor insensitivity, or applying the α4β2 antagonist DHβE. In vivo, NAc shell insulin inactivation decreased a glucose lick microstructure parameter indicative of hedonic impact in male and female rats, and prevented flavor-nutrient learning, tested only in males. The HS-HF diet decreased hedonic impact in males but not females, and prevented flavor-nutrient learning, tested only in males. The present study extends testing to more fully assess the translation of brain slice results to the behaving rat. Insulin inactivation by antibody microinjection in NAc shell was found to decrease the number of lick bursts emitted and average lick burst size, measures of incentive motivation and hedonic impact respectively, for a wide range of glucose concentrations in male and female rats. In contrast, the HS-HF diet decreased these lick parameters in males but not females. Follow-up two-bottle choice tests for 10 % versus 40 % glucose showed decreased intake of both concentrations by males but increased intake of 40 % glucose by females. In a further set of experiments, it was predicted that α4β2 receptor blockade would induce the same behavioral effects as insulin inactivation. In females, DHβE microinjection in NAc shell decreased both lick parameters for glucose as predicted, but in males only the number of lick bursts emitted was decreased. DHβE also decreased the number of lick bursts emitted for saccharin by females but not males. Finally, DHβE microinjection in NAc shell decreased flavor-nutrient learning in both sexes. The few discrepancies seen with regard to the hypothesized insulin-nicotinic-dopaminergic regulation of behavioral responses to nutritive sweetener, and its inhibition by HS-HF diet, are discussed with reference to sex differences in DA dynamics, female resistance to diet-induced metabolic morbidities, and extra-striatal cholinergic inputs to NAc.