ArticleEye (London, England)2024
The carbon footprint of French hospital ophthalmology consultations.
Article in Eye (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reducing the Carbon Footprint of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Therapy: Environmental Impact of Transitioning to Aflibercept 8 mg.Journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Contribution of hospitals and clinical services to global warming: a scoping systematic review.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Sustainability in medical retina: the environmental impact of using aflibercept 8 mg instead of aflibercept 2 mg in treatment-naïve patients with nAMD.Eye (London, England) · 2025Article
- Climate-Conscious Glaucoma Care: Strategies to Minimize the Environmental Impact in the Operating Room and in the Clinic.Journal of ophthalmology · 2025Review
- Carbon footprint comparison of video intubation tools: Disposable laryngoscopes, reusable laryngoscopes, and stylets.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFrance carbon footprint, with 604 million tons of CO
methodsThe perimeter of the investigation included consultations and excluded the surgeries and the hospitalisation. We calculated the carbon footprint of a single day of practice in our scope of investigation. We included consumption of energy, patient travel, staff travel, pharmaceutics and medical devices purchases, computer hardware, biomedical equipment/exam materials, and waste. We used the official French public database of emission factors: Base Empreinte® of the Environmental and Energy Management Agency of France.
resultsThe carbon footprint of a single day of our department was estimated at 1 688.65 kgCO
conclusionsThis study highlights the importance of patient travels, and possibly pharmaceutics, in the carbon footprint of hospital ophthalmology practice in France. More studies are needed to establish it at the national or international scale, as well as more carbon footprint analyses on products, especially those of high prices, to increase the accuracy of these studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.