ArticleAnti-cancer agents in medicinal chemistry2024
Immunologic Mechanisms of BCc1 Nanomedicine Synthesized by Nanochelating Technology in Breast Tumor-bearing Mice: Immunomodulation and Tumor Suppression.
Article in Anti-cancer agents in medicinal chemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Nanochelate-based BCc1 delivery and its impact on key regulatory pathways in BALB/c breast cancer: An analysis ofBiochemistry and biophysics reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe side effects of anti-cancer chemotherapy remain a concern for patients. So, designing alternative medications seems inevitable. In this research, the immunological mechanisms of BCc1 nanomedicine on tumor-bearing mice were investigated.
methodsBALB/c mice underwent tumor transplantation and were assigned into four groups. Group 1 was orally administered with PBS buffer, Group 2 was orally administered BCc1 10 mg/kg, and Group 3 was orally administered BCc1 40 mg/kg daily, respectively. In addition, a group of mice was administered Cyclophosphamide, 20 mg/kg daily. The weight and tumor volume of mice were evaluated bi-weekly. After 24 days of treatment, cytokines and CTL assay in the spleen cell and the tumor were assessed. Furthermore, the spleen, liver, kidney, lung, gut, and uterine tissue were stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Finally, the tumor samples were stained and analyzed for FOXP3. The survival rate of mice was recorded.
resultsThe results confirmed the histological safety of BCc1. This nanomedicine, especially BCc1 10 mg/kg, led to a strong IFN-γ response and suppressed TGF-β cytokine. The frequency of Treg in the tumor tissue of BCc1 nanomedicine groups was decreased. In addition, nanomedicine repressed tumor volume and tumor weight significantly, which was comparable to Cyclophosphamide. These immunologic events increased the survival rate of BCc1-treated groups. The results indicate that BCc1 nanomedicine can suppress tumor growth and thereby increase the survival rate of experimental mice.
conclusionIt seems a modulation in the tumor microenvironment and polarization toward a Th1 response may be involved. So, BCc1 nanomedicine is efficient for human cancer therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39069805What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.