ArticleJournal of clinical biochemistry and nutrition2024
Genetic predicted causal inferences between antioxidants and birth weight.
Article in Journal of clinical biochemistry and nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prenatal chemical exposures and fetal growth: a narrative review of gene-environment interactions (2025).Pediatric research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Observational studies have suggested a relationship between antioxidants and birth weight. However, the causal association remains unclear. The aim of this study was to assess the causal relationship between antioxidants and birth weight. Genome wide association study (GWAS) summary statistics for 4 endogenous and 7 exogenous antioxidants, as well as birth weight were obtained from GWAS studies and UK biobank. A two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis was conducted with fixed-effects model inverse variance weighted (IVW) as the primary analytical method, while MR Egger and weighted median used as auxiliary. A series of sensitivity analyses were conducted to verify the robustness of the results. The MR results revealed that genetically predicted higher superoxide dismutase (SOD) (β = 0.025; 95% CI: 0.008, 0.043;
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.