Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39071085›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024

Enhanced feature selection and ensemble learning for cardiovascular disease prediction: hybrid GOL2-2 T and adaptive boosted decision fusion with babysitting refinement.

S Phani Praveen, Mohammad Kamrul Hasan, Siti Norul Huda Sheikh Abdullah, Uddagiri Sirisha, N S Koti Mani Kumar Tirumanadham, Shayla Islam, Fatima Rayan Awad Ahmed, Thowiba E Ahmed, Ayman Afrin Noboni, Gabriel Avelino Sampedro and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

S Phani PraveenDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Prasad V Potluri Siddhartha Institute of Technology, Vijayawada, India.
Mohammad Kamrul HasanFaculty of Information Science and Technology, University Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia.
Siti Norul Huda Sheikh AbdullahFaculty of Information Science and Technology, University Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia.
Uddagiri SirishaDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Prasad V Potluri Siddhartha Institute of Technology, Vijayawada, India.
N S Koti Mani Kumar TirumanadhamDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Sir C R Reddy College of Engineering, Eluru, India.
Shayla IslamInstitute of Computer Science and Digital innovation, UCSI University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Fatima Rayan Awad AhmedComputer Science Department, College of Computer Engineering and Science, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia.
Thowiba E AhmedComputer Science Department, College of Science and Humanities-Jubail, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
Ayman Afrin NoboniDepartment of Surgery, Medical College For Women and Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Gabriel Avelino SampedroFaculty of Information and Communication Studies, University of the Philippines Open University, Los Baños, Philippines.
Chan Yeob YeunCentre for Cyber Physical Systems, Computer Science Department, Khalifa University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Taher M GhazalFaculty of Information Science and Technology, University Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Global Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is still one of the leading causes of death and requires the enhancement of diagnostic methods for the effective detection of early signs and prediction of the disease outcomes. The current diagnostic tools are cumbersome and imprecise especially with complex diseases, thus emphasizing the incorporation of new machine learning applications in differential diagnosis. Methods: This paper presents a new machine learning approach that uses MICE for mitigating missing data, the IQR for handling outliers and SMOTE to address first imbalance distance. Additionally, to select optimal features, we introduce the Hybrid 2-Tier Grasshopper Optimization with L2 regularization methodology which we call GOL2-2T. One of the promising methods to improve the predictive modelling is an Adaboost decision fusion (ABDF) ensemble learning algorithm with babysitting technique implemented for the hyperparameters tuning. The accuracy, recall, and AUC score will be considered as the measures for assessing the model. Results: On the results, our heart disease prediction model yielded an accuracy of 83.0%, and a balanced F1 score of 84.0%. The integration of SMOTE, IQR outlier detection, MICE, and GOL2-2T feature selection enhances robustness while improving the predictive performance. ABDF removed the impurities in the model and elaborated its effectiveness, which proved to be high on predicting the heart disease. Discussion: These findings demonstrate the effectiveness of additional machine learning methodologies in medical diagnostics, including early recognition improvements and trustworthy tools for clinicians. But yes, the model's use and extent of work depends on the dataset used for it really. Further work is needed to replicate the model across different datasets and samples: as for most models, it will be important to see if the results are generalizable to populations that are not representative of the patient population that was used for the current study.

Indexed as

adaboost decision fusion (ABDF)adaptive boosted decision fusioncardiovascular diseaseinterquartile rangemultivariate imputation by chained equationssynthetic minority over-sampling technique

Identifiers

PMID39071085
PMCPMC11272982

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.