ArticleHealth affairs scholar2024
Development and validation of a community risk score for sexual and reproductive health in the United States.
Article in Health affairs scholar, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Implementing Title X: policy design, administration, and geographic access to care.Health affairs scholar · 2026Article
- Comparison of the Association of Area-Based Deprivation Indices With Hypertension and Diabetes Control Outcomes.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
- External validation of a web- and artificial intelligence-based HIV/STI risk assessment tool: performance evaluation using data from Sydney sexual health centre.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Equitable access to sexual and reproductive health (SRH) care is key to reducing inequities in SRH outcomes. Publicly funded family-planning services are an important source of SRH care for people with social risk factors that impede their access. This study aimed to create a new index (Local Social Inequity in SRH [LSI-SRH]) to measure community-level risk of adverse SRH outcomes based on social determinants of health (SDoH). We evaluated the validity of the LSI-SRH scores in predicting adverse SRH outcomes and the need for publicly funded services. The data were drawn from more than 200 publicly available SDoH and SRH measures, including availability and potential need for publicly supported family planning from the Guttmacher Institute. The sample included 72 999 Census tracts (99.9%) in the 50 states and the District of Columbia. We used random forest regression to predict the LSI-SRH scores; 42 indicators were retained in the final model. The LSI-SRH model explained 81% of variance in the composite SRH outcome, outperforming 3 general SDoH indices. LSI-SRH scores could be a useful for measuring community-level SRH risk and guiding site placement and resource allocation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.