Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39071513›Full record

ArticleJournal of medicine and life2024

A 5-year evaluation of quality of life, pelvic discomfort, and sexual function following posterior pericervical repair.

Zinat Ghanbari, Parivash Jelodarian, Fatemeh Hosseini Salkisari, Samira Sohbati, Tahereh Eftekhar, Reihane Sadat Hosseini, Zahra Nezami, Maryam Deldar Pesikhani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medicine and life, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Zinat GhanbariDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pelvic Floor Fellowship, Faculty of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Parivash JelodarianPelvic Floor Fellowship, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fertility Infertility and Perinatology Research Center, School of Medicine, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
Fatemeh Hosseini SalkisariPelvic Floor Fellowship, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Samira SohbatiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinical Research Development Unit, Afzalipour Hospital, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
Tahereh EftekharDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pelvic Floor Fellowship, Faculty of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Reihane Sadat HosseiniDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pelvic Floor Fellowship, Faculty of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Zahra NezamiFellowship of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
Maryam Deldar PesikhaniDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pelvic Floor Fellowship, Faculty of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality of life, pelvic discomfort, and sexual function of patients who underwent posterior pericervical repair or level I to III surgical procedures for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) after 5 years of follow-up. This retrospective cohort study enrolled 107 women with POP who were referred to the Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, an academic center affiliated with the Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, from 2014 to 2021. The patients underwent transvaginal surgery using native tissue, in which the rectovaginal fascia was attached to the pericervical ring. The Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 (PFDI-20) and Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Module (ICIQ-FLUTSsex) questionnaires were completed by each patient before and 5 years after surgery. Of the 107 patients, only 78 completed the 5-year follow-up. The mean PFDI-20 scores before, 12 months, and 5 years after surgery were 141.87 ± 34.48, 100.87 ± 26.48, and 37.49 ± 56.39, respectively, indicating a significant improvement in the patients' symptoms after surgery (

Indexed as

Pelvic Organ ProlapseQuality of LifeAdultAgedCervix UteriCohort StudiesFemaleHumansIranMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSexual BehaviorSurveys and QuestionnairesLower Urinary Tract Symptoms Module (ICIQ-FLUTSsex)Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 (PFDI-20)pelvic organ prolapseprolapse surgery

Identifiers

PMID39071513
PMCPMC11282904

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.