ArticleHeliyon2024
ScLNet: A cornea with scleral lens OCT layers segmentation dataset and new multi-task model.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Wide-angle fluid reservoir thickness changes during short-term scleral lens wear.Eye and vision (London, England) · 2025Article
- Comparative Analysis of Deep Learning Architectures for Macular Hole Segmentation in OCT Images: A Performance Evaluation of U-Net Variants.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To develop deep learning methods with high accuracy for segmenting irregular corneas and detecting the tear fluid reservoir (TFR) boundary under the scleral lens. Additionally, this study aims to provide a publicly available cornea with scleral lens OCT dataset, including manually labeled layer masks for training and validation of segmentation algorithms. This study introduces ScLNet, a dataset comprising cornea with Scleral Lens (ScL) optical coherence tomography (OCT) images with layer annotations, and a multi-task network designed to achieve rapid, accurate, automated segmentation of scleral lens with regular and irregular corneas. Methods: We created a dataset comprising 31,360 OCT images with scleral lens annotations. The network architecture includes an encoder with multi-scale input and a context coding layer, along with two decoders for specific tasks. The primary task focuses on predicting ScL, TFR, and cornea regions, while the auxiliary task, aimed at predicting the boundaries of ScL, TFR, and cornea, enhances feature extraction for the main task. Segmentation results were compared with state-of-the-art methods and evaluated using Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), intersection over union (IoU), Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC), Precision, and Hausdorff distance (HD). Results: ScLNet achieves 98.22 % DSC, 96.50 % IoU, 98.13 % MCC, 98.35 % Precision, and 3.6840 HD (in pixels) in segmenting ScL; 97.78 % DSC, 95.66 % IoU, 97.71 % MCC, 97.70 % Precision, and 3.7838 HD (in pixels) in segmenting TFR; and 99.22 % DSC, 98.45 % IoU, 99.15 % MCC, 99.14 % Precision, and 3.5355 HD (in pixels) in segmenting cornea. The layer interfaces recognized by ScLNet closely align with expert annotations, as evidenced by high IoU scores. Boundary metrics further confirm its effectiveness. Conclusion: We constructed a dataset of corneal OCT images with ScL wearing, which includes regular and irregular cornea patients. The proposed ScLNet achieves high accuracy in extracting ScL, TFR, and corneal layer masks and boundaries from OCT images of the dataset.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.