Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39073166›Full record

ReviewNutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition2024

Role of artificial intelligence in critical care nutrition support and research.

Hannah D Kittrell, Ahmed Shaikh, Peter A Adintori, Paul McCarthy, Roopa Kohli-Seth, Girish N Nadkarni, Ankit Sakhuja

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Relationship between nutrition support and clinical outcomes in post-lung transplant patients in intensive care unit settings: A retrospective study.Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · 2026
    Article
  5. Artificial intelligence-guided nutritional therapy in the ICU.Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hannah D KittrellThe Charles Bronfman Institute for Personalized Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Ahmed ShaikhInstitute for Critical Care Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Peter A AdintoriFood and Nutrition Services Department, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Paul McCarthyDepartment of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Division of Cardiovascular Critical Care, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.
Roopa Kohli-SethInstitute for Critical Care Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Girish N NadkarniThe Charles Bronfman Institute for Personalized Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Ankit SakhujaThe Charles Bronfman Institute for Personalized Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2045-518X

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI SELWYN M VICKERS · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Elucidating Genetic and Environmental Second Hits in Racial and Ethnic Minorities with APOL1 High-Risk GenotypesR01DK127139 · NIDDK · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI NADKARNI, GIRISH NITIN · 2021 to 2025
$4.0M
Using Novel Machine Learning Methods to Personalize Strategies for Prevention of Persistent AKI after Cardiac SurgeryK08DK131286 · NIDDK · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI Ankit Sakhuja · 2022 to 2026
$774k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NIDDK NIH HHS K08 DK131286NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK127139This study was supported by National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases 5K08DK131286 (Sakhuja) and R01DK127139 (Nadkarni)This study was supported by National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases 5K08DK131286 (Shaikh) and R01DK127139 (Nadkarni)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nutrition plays a key role in the comprehensive care of critically ill patients. Determining optimal nutrition strategy, however, remains a subject of intense debate. Artificial intelligence (AI) applications are becoming increasingly common in medicine, and specifically in critical care, driven by the data-rich environment of intensive care units. In this review, we will examine the evidence regarding the application of AI in critical care nutrition. As of now, the use of AI in critical care nutrition is relatively limited, with its primary emphasis on malnutrition screening and tolerance of enteral nutrition. Despite the current scarcity of evidence, the potential for AI for more personalized nutrition management for critically ill patients is substantial. This stems from the ability of AI to integrate multiple data streams reflecting patients' changing needs while addressing inherent heterogeneity. The application of AI in critical care nutrition holds promise for optimizing patient outcomes through tailored and adaptive nutrition interventions. A successful implementation of AI, however, necessitates a multidisciplinary approach, coupled with careful consideration of challenges related to data management, financial aspects, and patient privacy.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCritical CareCritical IllnessNutritional SupportEnteral NutritionHumansIntensive Care UnitsMalnutritionNutrition Assessmentartificial intelligencecritical caremachine learningmalnutritionnutrition

Identifiers

PMID39073166
PMCPMC12723668

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.