ArticleThe ISME journal2024
Cell motility empowers bacterial contact weapons.
Article in The ISME journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bacterial weaponry and the ecological factors of competitive success.Essays in biochemistry · 2026Review
- Interspecies quorum sensing signals modulate multicellular organization and enhance contact-dependent antagonism in Vibrio cholerae.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Spatial structure: shaping the ecology and evolution of microbial communities.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2026Review
- Strategies and mechanisms of contact-dependent predation in bacteria.Current opinion in microbiology · 2025Review
- Fungal hyphae promote bacterial contact-dependent killing during surface-associated growth.The ISME journal · 2025Article
- Two-step localization driven by peptidoglycan hydrolase in interbacterial predation.The ISME journal · 2025Article
- Deciphering microbial spatial organization: insights from synthetic and engineered communities.ISME communications · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Many bacteria kill competitors using short-range weapons, such as the Type VI secretion system and contact dependent inhibition (CDI). Although these weapons can deliver powerful toxins, they rely on direct contact between attacker and target cells. We hypothesized that movement enables attackers to contact more targets and thus greatly empower their weapons. To explore this, we developed individual-based and continuum models of contact-dependent combat which show that motility greatly improves toxin delivery through two underlying processes. First, genotypic mixing increases the inter-strain contact probability of attacker and sensitive cells. Second, target switching ensures attackers constantly attack new cells, instead of repeatedly hitting the same cell. We test our predictions with the pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa, using genetically engineered strains to study the interaction between CDI and twitching motility. As predicted, we find that motility works synergistically with CDI, in some cases increasing weapon efficacy up to 10,000-fold compared with non-motile scenarios. Moreover, we demonstrate that both mixing processes occur using timelapse single-cell microscopy and quantify their relative importance by combining experimental data with our model. Our work shows how bacteria can combine cell movement with contact-based weapons to launch powerful attacks on their competitors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.