Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39074200›Full record

ReviewCardiovascular research2025

Pericytes in the brain and heart: functional roles and response to ischaemia and reperfusion.

Turgay Dalkara, Leif Østergaard, Gerd Heusch, David Attwell

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cardiovascular research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. GLP-1 activates KNature communications · 2026
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Pericytes in tissue fibrosis.American journal of physiology. Cell physiology · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Turgay DalkaraDepartment of Neuroscience, Bilkent University, Ankara 06800  Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0003-3943-7819
Leif ØstergaardCenter of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience (CFIN), Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Gerd HeuschInstitute for Pathophysiology, West German Heart and Vascular Center, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7078-4160
David AttwellDepartment of Neuroscience, Physiology & Pharmacology, University College London, Gower St., London WC1E 6BT, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3618-0843

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the last 20 years, there has been a revolution in our understanding of how blood flow is regulated in many tissues. Whereas it used to be thought that essentially all blood flow control occurred at the arteriole level, it is now recognized that control of capillary blood flow by contractile pericytes plays a key role both in regulating blood flow physiologically and in reducing it in clinically relevant pathological conditions. In this article, we compare and contrast how brain and cardiac pericytes regulate cerebral and coronary blood flow, focusing mainly on the pathological events of cerebral and cardiac ischaemia. The cerebral and coronary capillary beds differ dramatically in morphology, yet in both cases, pericyte-mediated capillary constriction plays a key role in restricting blood flow after ischaemia and possibly in other pathological conditions. We conclude with suggestions for therapeutic approaches to relaxing pericytes, which may prove useful in the long-term for reducing pericyte-induced ischaemia.

Indexed as

BrainBrain IschemiaCerebrovascular CirculationCoronary CirculationMyocardial IschemiaMyocardial Reperfusion InjuryPericytesAnimalsCoronary VesselsHumansAMIMicrocirculationNo-reflowPericytesStroke

Identifiers

PMID39074200
PMCPMC11976724

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.